The cofounder of Google’s AI division DeepMind says everybody will have their own AI-powered ‘chief of staff’ over the next five years::Mustafa Suleyman said AI will “intimately know your personal information” and be able to serve you 24-7.

  • doublejay1999@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    32
    ·
    1 year ago

    “Morning sir, I made an appointment with the dentist for you at 2.30. I also thought you might like to know about these penis growth pills and an investment in gold bullion I can recommend “

  • Eager Eagle@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    10
    ·
    edit-2
    1 year ago

    I do wonder why Cortana, Siri, Alexa, and Google Assistant are lagging so behind these LLMs. I personally don’t use them with any frequency other than setting timers, but it’s annoying to even consider using them and then realizing they are not as nearly as usable or helpful as ChatGPT.

    • Elohim@lemm.ee
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      8
      arrow-down
      1
      ·
      1 year ago

      The big thing that’s holding Apple back regarding Siri is that they aim to have all their AI-driven functions processed on the user’s hardware, for security/privacy. So they not only need the software component, they want to have the hardware capable of running it inside the individual phones.

      • Eager Eagle@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        6
        arrow-down
        2
        ·
        edit-2
        1 year ago

        eh… sounds like privacy theater to me. Only the audio transcription may be processed on the device.

        In all cases, transcripts of your interactions will be sent to Apple to process your requests

        src

        They might aim to have a full blown LLM on the device, but it’ll never be as good as the others with these limitations.

        • GBU_28@lemm.ee
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          1
          ·
          edit-2
          1 year ago

          Many teams are currently working on striking the right balance of fine tuning and model size. Most aren’t considering phones yet, but PCs off network.

          It is entirely possible to have an LLM run “closed loop”, but obviously Google and Apple want in that loop

    • WiseMoth@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      3
      ·
      1 year ago

      I know Apple’s developing their own LLM which will hopefully be used in Siri. There’s no guarantee, but I can’t think it would be too hard to add Bard into Google Assistant. Cortana on the other hand was canceled by Microsoft and is being replaced by Bing chat. I believe Amazon is also stopping the Alexa development

    • GBU_28@lemm.ee
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      3
      ·
      1 year ago

      For “impressive” general reasoning and conversation these LLM currently require pretty beefy hardware. You’re either lugging a GPU around or calling to an API.

      • elfin8er@lemm.ee
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        2
        ·
        1 year ago

        Aren’t these current personal assistants already relying on API calls for their responses?

        • GBU_28@lemm.ee
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          2
          ·
          1 year ago

          Like siri? Yes, my point pertained to hardware needed for LLM specifically though

  • nevemsenki@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    6
    ·
    1 year ago

    Kind of hard not to have an AI soon. Being the latest fad, even freaking toasters will have them soon, a’la IoT.

  • AssPennies@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    5
    arrow-down
    2
    ·
    1 year ago

    “The less a man makes declarative statements, the less apt he is to look foolish in retrospect.”

    This dude is going to look real foolish in five years (if not already).

  • EtherealMoon @lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    2
    arrow-down
    1
    ·
    1 year ago

    This sentiment in the current climate is stupid, but I do think the concept is inevitable. We didn’t always have phones on us 24/7, phones are already somewhat powered by AI. So what will everyone having their own AI look like in a way that doesn’t just sound like a chatGPT joke? What would make it a desirable future?

    • TitanLaGrange@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      3
      ·
      1 year ago

      So what will everyone having their own AI look like in a way that doesn’t just sound like a chatGPT joke? What would make it a desirable future?

      I guess that depends on how much authority you’d want to delegate.

      For me, it would be nice if I could have it do things like shopping tasks without being more of a pain than doing the task myself. For example, I needed to buy a hot-water carpet cleaner today. It would be great if I could tell it

      Hey Staffie, buy a carpet shampoo machine for home delivery within the next two weeks. Pick a highly rated machine from a widely recognized brand, and focus on carpet cleaning and water extraction performance, I don’t need any upholstery cleaning features. Don’t spend over $400. If the best option is under $200 don’t ask, just buy it. If it’s over $200, show me the top two options before buying.

      And end up with something pretty close to what I’d have picked if I did the shopping myself.

      It would also be great if I could have it reliably perform arbitrary tasks that it isn’t specifically programmed to do. Like

      Hey Staffie, check if I’ve got enough PTO to take next Thursday and Friday off, and if so, reserve a campsite for me at Foo State Park for three nights, preferably one close to the water, then send Mr. Boss an email letting him know I’ll be out those days.

      If it were particularly smart it would infer from previous conversations that I might want a 1lb propane cylinder, marshmallows, graham crackers, and Hershey bars added to my grocery list and would add them automatically (because it already knows my preferences about small automatic expenditures like that and is aware of the spending limits I’ve given it).

      Then it might come back a few minutes later and say

      'Hey boss, all the campsites within 250 of the water are already reserved, but site 1701D, which is near the only restroom and a tailhead, is available. Reviewers report that the park WiFi access point is installed at the restroom, so that site has good free internet service. Shall I reserve it?

      So yeah, in general, the ability to take arbitrary directions and execute them in reasonably intelligent ways (for example If I ask for a site Foo State Park, and there are two such parks in my country, it should be able to guess which park I’m talking about based on the context (like, if I’m reserving 3 nights and one of the parks is an hour down the road and the other is a two day drive, just assume the closer one)) and not require pre-programmed interfaces to every single thing. It should be able to search the web, find the interfaces humans use, and use those to do the kinds of things humans can do. It should also have some capabilities to use my accounts and passwords under a delegated authority to get shit done as my authorized assistant.

      Ideally it should also do things like observe my choices and infer my preferences so it can constrain choices it offers me:

      Hey Staffie, order lunch from Subway for pickup at 3.

      Sure boss, do you want your usual 6 inch turkey sub?

      Yep

      Nacho cheese chips or salt-n-vinegar?

      Nacho.

      Done, I’ll let you know when it’s ready.

      Stuff like that.

    • z00s@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      1
      arrow-down
      1
      ·
      1 year ago

      Being able to talk to it like a human, and have it complete tasks autonomously. That’s the million dollar implementation. Everyone will have their own personal assistant.