Just putting this here cause I found it a good overview of a pretty confusing situation I had no prior knowledge about

  • Pussista@sh.itjust.works
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    27
    arrow-down
    8
    ·
    8 months ago

    Also called moderators elsewhere. Without those, the internet would be unusable for anyone not a cishet white Christian fundamentalist.

      • eskimofry@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        5
        arrow-down
        3
        ·
        8 months ago

        You’re trying to argue reality is the same for everyone. But as a CisHet Guy It’s kind of obvious I get treated better than women and it just gets worse from Woman to then any of the LBTQIA+ community.

        I am not even white and christian and I can tell the difference. Please don’t try to argue about it being equally bad for everyone if moderation was taken away.

        • taladar@sh.itjust.works
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          5
          ·
          8 months ago

          No, I am trying to argue that moderators are relevant long before any of that (discrimination based on race, religion, gender,…) even starts to matter.

      • Pussista@sh.itjust.works
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        5
        arrow-down
        10
        ·
        8 months ago

        Depends on your perspective I guess. The way I see it: Moderators are (partially) there to limit the spread of hate so if you are a hate spreader, you would thrive without moderation, but if you are a hate receiver, you’re better off when moderation rules are enforced.

        • taladar@sh.itjust.works
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          10
          ·
          8 months ago

          Without moderators most spaces would be completely unusable due to spammers, trolls and others whose behavior and motivations have very little to do with their sexuality, politics, their skin tone or their religion.

          • eskimofry@lemmy.world
            link
            fedilink
            arrow-up
            2
            arrow-down
            1
            ·
            8 months ago

            You’re trying to dismiss an assertion by submitting a superset of the assertion. Which is usually done to belittle or ignore the orginal point in the argument, which is that a majoirty of those pushing back against CoC also romanticize the old boys group of experts.

            • taladar@sh.itjust.works
              link
              fedilink
              arrow-up
              3
              ·
              8 months ago

              The original point was to argue for CoC which is fine and can be done without antagonizing people with the tired old “white cis-het,…” nonsense in this context.

    • Vendetta9076@sh.itjust.works
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      3
      arrow-down
      5
      ·
      8 months ago

      I can’t wait for the rest of the world to he as online as America so we have bigotry of all creed race and sexualities.

      • gnuhaut@lemmy.ml
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        8
        arrow-down
        3
        ·
        8 months ago

        You think being a bigot is a skill issue do you? Like everyone deep down is just a bigot (self-inferred I assume?), and some people just have the social skills to hide that better? Have you tried not being a bigot instead of just hiding it?

        • 𝘋𝘪𝘳𝘬@lemmy.ml
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          5
          arrow-down
          6
          ·
          8 months ago

          Like everyone deep down is just a bigot (self-inferred I assume?), and some people just have the social skills to hide that better

          Basically this. Yes. This is how socialization works. This is also how a society works.

          I have no problem with Vaxry since I don’t know him personally. I don’t think we could be friends, based on what he says online. But to me this is absolutely irrelevant when it comes to using the software he maintains.