Natal conference, to be held in Austin in December, promoted on far-right podcast circuit and set to host self-described eugenicists

A high-end hotel in the liberal Texan enclave of Austin is playing host to a conference whose theme is boosting global birth rates, but which will in fact feature racist and eugenicist internet personalities and far-right media figures.

The Natal conference – whose website warns that “by the end of the century, nearly every country on earth will have a shrinking population, and economic systems dependent on reliable growth will collapse” – is scheduled to be held on 1 December at the Line Hotel.

  • Thunderbird4@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    47
    arrow-down
    1
    ·
    1 year ago

    economic systems dependent on reliable growth will collapse

    Huh, maybe that’s the actual problem.

  • gravitas_deficiency@sh.itjust.works
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    39
    ·
    1 year ago

    Tbh, given all the stupid and crazy shit happening on the right side of our political system, I figured it was only a matter of time before eugenics made a very unwelcome yet unironic comeback.

    Next stop: phrenology!

      • CADmonkey@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        18
        ·
        edit-2
        1 year ago

        In one of the Discworld novels by Sir Terry there is mention of a retrophrenologist. Someone who uses a hammer to adjust the person’s skull so they gain the desired traits.

        And I’m trying to decide if I should advertise such a service to these goofballs, because someone would probably fall for it.

        EDIT: “Feet of Clay” is the novel in question.

    • Coricus@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      1
      ·
      1 year ago

      Oh, phrenology’s been back for a while. Or at the very least, these idiots have been taking tape measures to bones because of bigoted nonsense. Phrenology in the historical sense might actually be too complex for them.

      Incel communities have long been touting the existence of a dating appeal hierarchy based on “canthal tilt” and “hunter eyes.” They believe that you’re born more or less likely to pick up “Stacies” based on the subtle shape of your eyebrows and chin. Meanwhile, “transvestigators” take the “we can always tell” insistence of transphobes to such insane depths that they think they can tell from photographs and video that every person they see on TV is transgender and secretly part of a literal satanic cult because of minute observations that they think they’re making about celebrity bone structure. Oh, yeah, and it’s a huge staple of transphobia just in general. “Transvestigators” have just raised it to what they think is an art form, but is really just raw, concentrated delusion.

      Never underestimate the depths of pseudoscience to which people will stoop in order to create out-groups. You will always be disappointed.

      • Flying Squid@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        14
        arrow-down
        4
        ·
        1 year ago

        Which economists? I’m sure I can find some who believe that population should be reduced. Economics is more opinion than science.

        • gravitas_deficiency@sh.itjust.works
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          14
          ·
          1 year ago

          The prevailing consensus of economists in capitalist countries is that we should just keep running on that treadmill to generate “limitless” growth.

    • utopianfiat@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      5
      arrow-down
      9
      ·
      1 year ago

      And which social or ethnic group in particular do you suggest should be the ones to be sacrificed exactly? The answer to eugenics is not more eugenics.

      • Flying Squid@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        17
        arrow-down
        1
        ·
        1 year ago

        Why does there have to be a sacrifice? Why can’t people just be encouraged to use contraception?

        • utopianfiat@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          1
          arrow-down
          1
          ·
          1 year ago

          How do you encourage marginalized people who have been historically discouraged from breeding due to eugenics reasons to voluntarily stop breeding because the people in power just lowkey want them to?

  • PrincessLeiasCat@sh.itjust.works
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    15
    ·
    1 year ago

    Oh, Texas - the state that lets women die in childbirth because of nothing based on medical science whatsoever…great place to encourage women to get pregnant.

  • Dr. Dabbles@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    10
    ·
    1 year ago

    Not that much of a revelation. We’ve already seen what these weirdos think in their Twitter posts.

  • ArbitraryValue@sh.itjust.works
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    6
    arrow-down
    28
    ·
    1 year ago

    The article simply labels people and organizations “far right” without specifying what “far right” means in this context or what exactly most of those people and organizations have said or done which is supposedly “far right”. It might as well just be a list of names labeled “bad guys”. I expected better reporting from the Guardian.

    • ClockworkOtter@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      31
      ·
      1 year ago

      Do you really have to be hand-held past the “eugenics” and “white nationalism” mentioned in the article to figure out what they mean by “far right?”

      • Throwaway@lemm.ee
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        2
        arrow-down
        23
        ·
        1 year ago

        Well yeah. Show me where the eugenics abd white nationalism are, because Im not seeing it.

        Looks like bog standard name calling to me.