What are the main differences between pipewire and pulseaudio? Which one is better? What are other alternative popular sound servers besides these two?

  • The Postminimalist@sh.itjust.works
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    12
    ·
    1 year ago

    Pipewire is much better than Pulseaudio, especially for pro audio work because of its low latency. Another popular option is JACK, which must be used in conjunction with Pulseaudio. Harder to set up, but is also great for pro audio. Some audio engineers were having issues with Pipewire when it first came out so they went back to using JACK, but I think Pipewire has improved. Pipewire has been flawless on my end.

    If you’re not in pro audio or any kind of multimedia work, it doesn’t really matter and you can just stick with whatever comes pre-configured on your distro. But my vote goes to Pipewire as the best server for pretty much anyone.

    • uis@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      1
      ·
      1 year ago

      which must be used in conjunction with Pulseaudio

      Why? Just why?

      any kind of multimedia work, it doesn’t really matter and you can just stick with whatever comes pre-configured on your distro. But my vote goes to Pipewire as the best server for pretty much anyone.

      Or gaming. PulseAudio has insane latency. Use JACK or no server(that means use ALSA). Maybe Pipewire has tolerable latency, but I didn’t test it myself.

  • Presi300@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    11
    ·
    1 year ago

    Tl;Dr use pipewire, it’s just better and also handles screen capture on Wayland (which looks way better and has a much lower performance impact than X native screen capture in my experience)

  • uis@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    1
    arrow-down
    1
    ·
    edit-2
    1 year ago

    Read xkcd. To be fair it doesn’t seem to create new audio api, but be alternative implementation.

    I still recommend bare ALSA for average users. This includes gamers.