• 1stTime4MeInMCU@mander.xyz
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    19
    arrow-down
    1
    ·
    9 months ago

    They also offered to “swap” her for the lot next door. F that, they should offer to buy it from her for fair market value

        • schmidtster@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          6
          arrow-down
          33
          ·
          edit-2
          9 months ago

          The options are restore it (identical lot next door), or a fair market value, which would be the cost of the land plus repair, or a suitable replacement. She ignored two fair trades that have plenty of precedent in courts, to achieve more damages than she should be entitled too. She definitely seems like she’s trying to get her cake and eat it here too.

          You aren’t entitled to the value of the house, that’s going above and beyond damages.

          • Wrench@lemmy.world
            link
            fedilink
            arrow-up
            48
            arrow-down
            2
            ·
            9 months ago

            Yes. How dare her object to her property being irrevocably changed without her consent. How dare she not just roll over and accept a completely different property in exchange to make it easy on them.

            No two properties are the same. You can’t decide for another that your attempt at a compromise (that only benefits you) is sufficient.

            • schmidtster@lemmy.world
              link
              fedilink
              arrow-up
              6
              arrow-down
              37
              ·
              edit-2
              9 months ago

              Shit happens, she was given recourse and demanded far more than the damages she incurred.

              How does swapping two properties benefit one? They need to pay for all the legal paperwork and everything, they aren’t coming out ahead, since the cost of the house would be the same on either property.

              You seem to think the developer benefits here? Even though it’ll costs thousands of dollars in legal fees to process everything? And in the end all they have is a lot with a house, that they would have still had regardless? Where is the benefit to the developer?

              And yes, when it comes track homes every property is more or less the exact same, that’s the entire point of them. Theres actually very few cases where lots have any significant difference to them, except for custom communities that are a rarity anywhere.

              • JJROKCZ@lemmy.world
                link
                fedilink
                arrow-up
                27
                arrow-down
                1
                ·
                9 months ago

                Shit like this does not happen and when it does the person who fucked up needs to be taught the reason this is rare. In this case the developer needs to be held accountable, they won’t because they’ll file bankruptcy and open a new llc the following week though

              • AA5B@lemmy.world
                link
                fedilink
                arrow-up
                25
                arrow-down
                1
                ·
                9 months ago

                The benefit to the developer is being able to be careless, make an expensive mistake, and get off for almost nothing

              • IamtheMorgz@lemmy.world
                link
                fedilink
                arrow-up
                6
                arrow-down
                2
                ·
                9 months ago

                Okay let’s go with your thing. So developer can now, by your logic, pick any property they want and just build there without the consent of the owner, as long as they later find a similar enough lot to switch with the owner later? And the owner just has to agree to it because it’s still a fair trade?

                • schmidtster@lemmy.world
                  link
                  fedilink
                  arrow-up
                  3
                  arrow-down
                  7
                  ·
                  edit-2
                  9 months ago

                  Of course they can’t just up and fucking do it lmfao, the second time a company tried that they would lose their business license and everything else. The courts aren’t stupid like you are.

                  Shit happens, most people understand this, I’m sorry you expect everyone to be perfect.

                  • ghterve@lemmy.world
                    link
                    fedilink
                    arrow-up
                    5
                    arrow-down
                    2
                    ·
                    9 months ago

                    They don’t expect them to be perfect. They expect them to be accountable for the consequences of their mistakes.