With climate change looming, it seems so completely backwards to go back to using it again.

Is it coal miners pushing to keep their jobs? Fear of nuclear power? Is purely politically motivated, or are there genuinely people who believe coal is clean?


Edit, I will admit I was ignorant to the usage of coal nowadays.

Now I’m more depressed than when I posted this

  • JohnDClay@sh.itjust.works
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    3
    ·
    1 year ago

    I thought net zero meant there was no net co2 being emitted at any time? This is saying countries can claim net zero by just promising to remove co2 in the future. I’ve never seen it used that way, is that the common understanding?

    • StandingCat@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      9
      ·
      1 year ago

      The way people get to net zero is stupid accounting tricks. I burned a whole bunch of coal, but i paid a buddy of mine to plant trees. So now Im celebrating net zero with my buddy in his brand new tesla roadster. Who knew planting trees was so lucrative.

      • JohnDClay@sh.itjust.works
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        3
        ·
        1 year ago

        So we need good regulation to make sure the carbon is being sequestered. If planting trees and then burying them actually gets carbon permanently out of the atmosphere, I’m all for it. I would love planting trees to be lucrative, we could use more forests, they’re great!

    • WhatAmLemmy@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      1
      ·
      1 year ago

      It’s a lie because several of the dependent solutions are essentially impossible to achieve (given time, technology, resources, investment, economics, etc), as well as being the bare minimum necessary to avert disaster, with a deadline decades after it’s required to avert disaster.

      Read the link to understand why.