1.
2.
3.
4.
5.
6.
They’re all AI because whatever phone took those pictures has AI upscaling
Assuming some are real and some are fake, my bet is 1 and 3 are fake.
- Fake
2 . Real 3. Fake 4. Real 5. Fake 6. Real
You are correct! 0 is also real.
Nature shots have been cheating for a while, because most errors are still plausible.
The major tell is how screen-space anything is. In real life, there’s very few angles where the top of a close thing stops at the bottom of a far thing… but neural networks aren’t modeling depth. Probably. So things are tangent or coincident all the dang time. Even in the patterns of grass and brush and whatnot, where the network does T-junction patterns like brickwork or cracked pottery, when it should be closer to woven or thatched.
With the HDR effect added to these it’s honestly difficult to tell which are generations and which are just heavily post processed
In this instance these are straight out of the camera jpegs. I did zero post processing.
Lol I knew it. I was right.
Only 4 looks real to me. Rest AI
You gonna tell us the answer?
I am, but I was going to wait until at least the middle of the afternoon.
All real?
All looks more than plausible, even the tree in the middle of the water in 0 and 6
- Is definitely AI
About the rest I’m not sure. 3. and 5. look a bit suspicious
1, 3, 5, and 6. The grass is all funky on 1, 3, and 5. The tree and grass on the far left side of 6 is all smeared and stretchy.
I think its AI on 1,5, & 6
My guess is they’re all real except #5. That one doesn’t have as many good reflections off the water.
