• jeffw@lemmy.worldM
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      11
      arrow-down
      4
      ·
      9 months ago

      The child asked for help and was neglected. Had he not committed a crime, wouldn’t we be calling him a victim?

        • jeffw@lemmy.worldM
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          3
          arrow-down
          1
          ·
          9 months ago

          Sure, but then we’re talking about him as a victim still. So why is he spending his entire life in prison? Some are cheering the Gypsy Rose Blanchard release, but saying this kid is a murderer who deserves to live behind bars

      • Zirconium@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        14
        arrow-down
        2
        ·
        9 months ago

        Especially since he was 15 at the time of shooting and was literally incapable of getting mental health treatment (if your parents dgaf it’s basically impossible)

        • PineRune@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          1
          ·
          9 months ago

          I wasn’t trying to say he’s not guilty in my original comment, but rather, if our country as a whole viewed crime and punishment differently, this kind of situation could be avoided altogether. Hypothetical, I know, but conditioning people to help those in need, in turn, reduces the rate at which people treat others poorly. If this kid was treated better in the first place, it could be said he would have never committed this crime, but now he has, and there’s no coming back from that. With his punishment, he will be facing a life of psychological tortue, which won’t make anything better.