• ikiru@lemmy.ml
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    18
    arrow-down
    3
    ·
    1 year ago

    US will start focusing on reigniting America’s Backyard policy.

    If it wasn’t for 9/11 and the invasions of Iraq and Afghanistan, the US would have probably invaded Venezuela to remove Chavez and destroy the revolution to get their oil. They’ve already started drumming up Latin America as the next warzone again. We’ll be seeing the entire region further destabilized more than it already is.

    • BigFig@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      12
      arrow-down
      4
      ·
      edit-2
      1 year ago

      No, last time they let someone in it was the US going after Poncho Villa, and then the whole Mexican American war happened

      Same actors this time, and same excuses

      • Someonelol@lemmy.ml
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        9
        arrow-down
        1
        ·
        1 year ago

        Pancho Villa attacked US border towns in 1916 which prompted general John J Pershing to launch an unsuccessful expeditionary force to capture or kill him. The Mexican American War happened in 1846 to 1848 which was before his time. I think you might be referring to the Mexican Border War that was part of the bigger Mexican Revolution going on at the time. Either way I doubt Mexico would allow another military incursion from the north this time around.

        • UltraMagnus0001@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          3
          ·
          1 year ago

          Was that the one where the Americans started moving into Mexico because they were encouraged to and then america used it as an excuse to attack Mexico? Now Mexico turned into Texas, Arizona, California etc and the irony is that anyone that looks native to those areas are illegal immigrants even though they were there before "the new world was discovered. James Polk?

          • Someonelol@lemmy.ml
            link
            fedilink
            arrow-up
            3
            arrow-down
            1
            ·
            1 year ago

            Mexico encouraged Americans to move into Texas as means to populate and develop the area so long as the settlers agreed to assimilate to Mexican culture. Unfortunately the settlers weren’t loyal to the Mexican government and started a revolt for independence when Mexico outlawed slavery in 1829. Thanks to the fumblings of general Santa Anna, the rebels captured him and had him sign the Treaties of Velasco in 1836 essentially conceding all land above the Rio Grande to the rebels in exchange for his life.

            This of course infuriated the central Mexican government and they refused to ratify the treaties. Due to internal instability though the central government was unable to do much about it and had no choice but to leave the matter alone. It was only after Texas was admitted to the US as a slave state did president James K Polk start a fight with Mexico over the territory that eventually led to Mexico’s defeat and loss of all other land that make up the states you’re referring to.

            Even though all Mexican citizens who ended up in the new American borders were invited to stay as American citizens, some were systematically deported over the years well into the early 20th century.

  • Jumper775@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    11
    arrow-down
    12
    ·
    1 year ago

    We could easily overpower them, let’s just take Mexico. On top of that let’s just grab Canada and then just take all of North America except Panama (tax haven)

    • geekworking@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      7
      ·
      1 year ago

      If we take Mexico, then all Mexicans will become legal US residents.

      Immigration Problem solved.

      That would be priceless irony for all of those “build a wall” ass hats.

      • Jumper775@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        1
        ·
        1 year ago

        I say we just deport them anyway after we take Mexico so that we can still use the immigration issues for political… stuff

  • thisisawayoflife@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    2
    arrow-down
    23
    ·
    1 year ago

    TBH, we should just be droniing the people in charge without permission anyway. What’s Mexico going to do, attack us?

    • Corkyskog@sh.itjust.works
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      11
      ·
      1 year ago

      They could just cutoff exports and watch inflation go insane and the automotive industry grind to a halt. The line between cartel and government gets blurrier by the day, so attacking the cartels in a way is attacking Mexico.

      • atlasraven31@lemm.ee
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        2
        arrow-down
        1
        ·
        1 year ago

        You could argue the cartels do more to help the average person than the government.

        • Corkyskog@sh.itjust.works
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          3
          arrow-down
          1
          ·
          1 year ago

          You could, but it’s short sighted. Open warfare in the streets kills lucrative business. But as I said in a previous post from polling, the average teen would rather be a Zeta than a cop, that’s says a lot.

          It’s just a shit show. If I were Mexican president I would probably just make a deal with the most powerful cartel to help eliminate their competition and further integrate them in government affairs, while allowing them to have free reign over any drug smuggling and possibly actively encourage it… as long as the murders stop. Only can assassinate your rival gang members in planned strikes with help of police or military. I mean they have to be so fed up with the situation. AMLO is a bit of an asshole, but America refuses to stem the massive inflow of guns and do absolutely nothing about curbing drug demand or introducing cheaper legal alternatives.

      • thisisawayoflife@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        3
        arrow-down
        14
        ·
        1 year ago

        Good! Hurt corporations and force them to bring those jobs back to the US or go bankrupt. At this point I think we should just rip the band-aid off.

        • bassomitron@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          8
          arrow-down
          1
          ·
          1 year ago

          Then the costs of labor jump considerably and cars suddenly cost 2x as much. Economics and geopolitics isn’t as simple as you’re making it out to be. Cars are far from the only thing Mexico exports a lot of to the US.

    • Not_mikey@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      2
      ·
      edit-2
      1 year ago

      “Poor mexico, So far from God, So close to the United States.”

      -Porfirio Diaz, former president/dictator of Mexico, in reference to ideas like this.