Measure 110, an experiment approved in 2020, gets overhauled as state grapples with fentanyl crisis and growing public drug use

Oregon lawmakers have moved to reintroduce criminal penalties for the possession of hard drugs, in effect ending the state’s groundbreaking three-year decriminalization experiment.

In 2020, nearly 60% of voters moved to decriminalize the possession of small amounts of illicit drugs with the passage of Measure 110, but the new law had grown increasingly controversial as the state grappled with the fentanyl crisis and growing public drug use.

Lawmakers had recently reached a bipartisan deal to undo a key aspect of the law and make minor possession a misdemeanor, while also allocating millions of dollars toward specialty court programs as well as mental health and addiction treatment.

  • conditional_soup@lemm.ee
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    36
    ·
    1 year ago

    From the article:

    Lawmakers had recently reached a bipartisan deal to undo a key aspect of the law and make minor possession a misdemeanor, while also allocating millions of dollars toward specialty court programs as well as mental health and addiction treatment.

    So, no, it’s modifying the law, not undoing it.

    But research has so far showed no correlation between the rise in overdoses and decriminalization.

    HMMMM.

    Still, the public health crisis, coupled with a shortage in affordable housing that has fueled homelessness, has become more visible and residents and business owners have grown increasingly exasperated. City residents report seeing people openly smoking fentanyl in downtowns while small towns that had historically low rates of homelessness are now seeing encampments.

    “What has developed in the last three years is not the utopian Shangri-La that we have been promised with ballot Measure 110,” Christopher Parosa, the Eugene district attorney, said at a community forum this year, “but rather a dystopian nightmare that is akin to a grim Hollywood movie.”

    Ah, yes, the west coast, famously devoid of homeless people, suddenly inundated with them. Couldn’t have anything to do with, idk, it costing $600 just to rent a room in even a smaller city? $900-1100 for a one bedroom apartment? The cost and supply of housing has nothing to do with the homelessness crisis that’s basically been stewing since 2008, it’s definitely just the last two years of decriminalization? Okay.

    Also notably absent: actual, verifiable data-backed evidence that this has been a policy disaster. Plenty of anecdote, though, so I’m sure they’re onto the truth of the matter.

      • conditional_soup@lemm.ee
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        1
        ·
        1 year ago

        Get a few people together and start raising hell at city council. I’m doing it. Together we can all demand better cities.

        • Pacmanlives@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          1
          ·
          1 year ago

          I wish that would work but not in a real city it would take a few thousand with pitchforks and mortars basically killing everyone and everything.

          So you going full Detroit or Cleveland both cities I love and love to visit but would not live there

          • conditional_soup@lemm.ee
            link
            fedilink
            arrow-up
            1
            ·
            edit-2
            1 year ago

            Well, you could always just wait and see if things get better, but it doesn’t seem to be working.

            ¯\_(ツ)_/¯