• LWD@lemm.ee
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    5
    arrow-down
    1
    ·
    10 months ago

    You’re right, I mentioned it because it seemed like a good counterexample to your reasoning.

    … Apparently you agree?

    • gregorum@lemm.ee
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      2
      arrow-down
      7
      ·
      edit-2
      10 months ago

      I wish I were on the drugs you are to find the reason in the obviously logically flawed and contradictory madness you keep making of this.

      But if you need to keep telling yourself that espionage is OK just because some governments engage in some forms of mass surveillance, then I can’t stop you from making a fool of yourself by saying so. ¯\_(ツ)_/¯

      I still think that both are bad, and I still find it pretty easy to argue both points without conflating the two logically fallaciously.

      Thing is, even if we don’t agree, I think you could do better arguing either or both points without conflating the two. And I think you’d be more convincing, if you didn’t rely on conflating them. That’s what I’m trying to say, is that you’re not really wrong on one point, the other is logically fallacious, but that you’re wrong for trying to say that they’re related.

      • LWD@lemm.ee
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        4
        ·
        10 months ago

        What did Edward Snowden do, if not technically espionage? Some other crime?

        Sometimes, it’s good to do crimes. The more oppressive the government, generally speaking, then more good things might get turned into crimes. Criticism of the government. Protest. Etc.