• Ech@lemm.ee
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    19
    arrow-down
    17
    ·
    10 months ago

    Does anyone else feel this (and, subsequently, the term itself) is mildly racist? Or at least defensive of racist/bigoted statements? Like, if someone said “I could do without [insert race here],” is it unreasonable to hold them accountable? I get this is intended to be about people not letting go of minor nitpicks, but the setup is pretty poor, imo.

    • DingoBilly@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      13
      arrow-down
      1
      ·
      edit-2
      10 months ago

      It depends on the context as always.

      Sealioning as genuine trolling is shitty and done in bad faith.

      But it is completely fair to call out people and ask them for evidence when they make broad statements that are easily verifiable like “black people are more violent than white people” or “Republicans are just as unfriendly towards poor people as Democrats” Etc.

      But yeah, here without the context it’s easy to get confused what Sealioning actually is.

      • Viking_Hippie@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        5
        ·
        10 months ago

        Sealioning as genuine trolling is shitty and done in bad faith.

        It’s literally part of the definition that it’s in bad faith. Otherwise it isn’t sealioning.

      • Classy@sh.itjust.works
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        1
        ·
        10 months ago

        Yeah, this isn’t just someone wanting a reasonable conversation and not getting it. This is the guy on reddit who goes on your profile and follows you around to other subs demanding your reply to a conversation you disengaged with weeks ago.

    • chicken@lemmy.dbzer0.com
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      2
      arrow-down
      1
      ·
      10 months ago

      It’s a broad defense of prejudice, but naturally people are going to choose the prejudices they like as the legitimate ones.