• SeaJ@lemm.ee
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    26
    arrow-down
    10
    ·
    edit-2
    1 year ago

    Optical discs are not really meant for longterm storage on their own. Disc rot is a real thing.

    Edit: I should have gone into a bit more detail. Yes, optical storage discs CAN be okay for longer term storage. But it depends on quite a few factors. The material itself has to be long lasting, the manufacturer has to have good quality control, and the end client should store it in a controlled environment. It’s it better or worse than alternatives. No idea without the actual data. It certainly has better density.

    • mipadaitu@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      9
      ·
      1 year ago

      Optical discs are not one thing, they’re a variety of different technologies. This particular one is predicted to last many decades.

      • fuckwit_mcbumcrumble@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        8
        arrow-down
        1
        ·
        1 year ago

        recently fixed

        No, not really. Generally as a product ages the quality control goes down since demand isn’t there. You can make archival grade CDs that will last a life time, it just costs too much money for anyone to want to pay for it. Plus business have tape which is plenty good for long term storage.

        • Flying Squid@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          3
          ·
          1 year ago

          That makes sense. Why improve the process if it costs more to do so and most people don’t need it to last that long? But at least archival-quality CDs are out there.

    • banichan@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      3
      ·
      1 year ago

      Depends on what material they switch to. They could be using some new polymer or something, hence the longer lifespan.

      • SeaJ@lemm.ee
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        2
        ·
        1 year ago

        True. It also depends on manufacturer quality controls and end client storage environment. I just recall that being a big selling point for DVD and CDs only for some people to find unreadable garbage after a decade. Or at least not easily readable garbage.

    • wildbus8979@sh.itjust.works
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      3
      arrow-down
      1
      ·
      edit-2
      1 year ago

      *Some optical discs. Others not so much, it’s not an inevitability… M-DISC, introduced in 2009, has a rating with proper storage of one THOUSAND years. They are even readable and writable by most regular DVD/Blueray drives!

      https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/M-DISC

      I absolutely cannot wait for these new discs to be available!

    • 1024_Kibibytes@lemm.ee
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      2
      arrow-down
      3
      ·
      1 year ago

      That was my question about this. It can store a lot of data, great! But will the media last 10 years or more? For real long term storage it needs to last decades.

      • don@lemm.ee
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        7
        ·
        1 year ago

        From the article:

        Another associated benefit would be the minimisation of data migration. The discs are said to be highly stable, with an expected lifespan of 50 to 100 years. That’s a huge leap over current data centre HDD based storage systems, which generally move data over to new devices every five to 10 years to avoid data-loss from ageing drives.