• Fake4000@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    18
    ·
    11 months ago

    I actually though they would federate with something like mastodon.

    Kinda useless really.

  • greaprr@sh.itjust.works
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    6
    ·
    11 months ago

    I can never find a straight answer to this - which may be the answer in and of itself - but do they plan to federate with anyone besides themselves in the future?

    • jayandp@sh.itjust.works
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      7
      ·
      11 months ago

      They aren’t using ActivityPub, what Mastodon and Lemmy use, they’re using their own new protocol called AT (Authenticated Transfer). So it’s less that they don’t plan on federating with anybody else, and more that there’s nobody to federate with. Maybe somebody else might pickup AT in the future, but AT is still a work in progress and there isn’t a lot of incentive for anybody to do so yet.

    • psychothumbs@lemmy.worldOP
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      4
      ·
      11 months ago

      I believe the idea is that they’re not federating with any other existing site, they’re creating a new variety of federation with themselves as the first member, with people being able to set themselves up as additional independent nodes in that federation.

  • Clot@lemm.ee
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    6
    ·
    11 months ago

    Why not just use AP? who else will use their protocol? also it doesnt even seem “federation” for real as other users pointed out here

    • aeharding@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      8
      arrow-down
      2
      ·
      11 months ago

      Why not just use AP?

      https://urbanists.video/w/n7xyeV1kbW8mUKr4ncchhs

      That blusky didn’t use [activitypub] is so typical of these companies. It’s like the lightning cable when everyone else is using USB-C. Fuck you apple, and your shitty plug. And fuck you blusky and your reinvention of the wheel. Use the standard you egotistical F$*!4.

  • CALIGVLA@lemmy.dbzer0.com
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    7
    arrow-down
    2
    ·
    11 months ago

    Outside of bluesky who’s even using their protocol? Such a weird way of doing things when AP is already a thing…

  • MysticKetchup@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    2
    ·
    11 months ago

    So Federation lets you move your data, but that’s it? It still has global moderation and from what it sounds like all accounts are still dependent on the original BlueSky server to login. So if it goes down, doesn’t that just take all servers with it?

    • Jonathan@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      5
      ·
      11 months ago

      It is more complicated than that. There are multiple different server components that make up Bluesky and its federation. The PDS (Person Data Server) is what they’re mostly talking about in that press release. You can however run all three major server components yourself and setup a completely separate network that would then federate with Bluesky proper. It’s quite different to Mastodon and other ActivityPub services (where you setup a Mastodon, Lemmy, WriteFreely, etc… instance and then federate).

      Still, at present it does feel a little pointless.