Scientists aghast at bizarre AI rat with huge genitals in peer-reviewed article | It’s unclear how such egregiously bad images made it through peer-review.::It’s unclear how such egregiously bad images made it through peer-review.

  • Lvxferre@mander.xyz
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    12
    ·
    10 months ago

    The impact of image and text generators on scientific research is a blessing disguised as a curse, as it shows how sloppy (or in this case, non-existent) reviewing has become.

    Perhaps it’s time to review the reviewing?

    • KevonLooney@lemm.ee
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      2
      ·
      10 months ago

      The article in question is titled “Cellular functions of spermatogonial stem cells in relation to JAK/STAT signaling pathway,” which was authored by three researchers in China, including the corresponding author Dingjun Hao of Xi’an Honghui Hospital. It was published online Tuesday in the journal Frontiers in Cell and Developmental Biology.

      The issue of fake papers coming out of China has been known as an epidemic for at least a decade. “Publish or perish” is a worldwide problem but it’s another level there.

      AI just makes this funnier.

    • General_Effort@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      1
      ·
      10 months ago

      About a decade back, a reputable scientist published an article in a top journal in his field, “proving” that people are able to see the future. People said the same thing then, but I doubt anything has changed.

  • Muehe@lemmy.ml
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    11
    arrow-down
    1
    ·
    10 months ago

    At this point somebody should really create a /c/Aipocalypse community or something to collect stuff like this.

  • General_Effort@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    1
    ·
    10 months ago

    The journal is: Frontiers in Cell and Developmental Biology

    Non-rhetorical question: Is there any journal with “Frontiers” in the name that is not a bit lawless?

    To me, it implies that the journal is more “open-minded”, for better or worse.

    • ReveredOxygen@sh.itjust.works
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      1
      ·
      10 months ago

      I don’t have the answer to your question, but have you looked at the article? I don’t think any journal would typically be publishing utter nonsense as the images in it

      • General_Effort@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        2
        ·
        10 months ago

        Not a reputable journal. Not one where science actually takes place. But there are journals for anything, including journals where the peer-review is limited to your payment.