• Cyberflunk@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    37
    ·
    2 years ago

    “lacking skills” probably means people want fair pay.

    You’re expanding your empire on the backs of people. Fucking pay them. Train them.

    Fucking upend the system, you greedy entitled fucks.

    • assembly@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      13
      ·
      2 years ago

      Yeah I can’t imagine there is any shortage in the US with skill not to mention that AZ is a home to Intel manufacturing so there are trained people. My guess is that they want skilled people to work for far less than they are worth. Pay the right price and there won’t be a shortage.

    • zephyreks@lemmy.mlM
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      4
      ·
      2 years ago

      Having worked with IC engineers in Taiwan and America… Honestly, it’s a night and day difference and most of it isn’t because of work hours.

  • nekandro@lemmy.mlOP
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    8
    arrow-down
    1
    ·
    2 years ago

    The only company to have actually received money from CHIPS is the defence contractor BAE Systems.

    • Zipitydew@sh.itjust.works
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      3
      ·
      edit-2
      2 years ago

      So far, yeah. They already have a significant US operation in New Hampshire that’s being expanded and upgraded. It shouldn’t be a surprise such a company met the US production requirements first because military hardware contracts require significant levels of domestic content to begin with that BAE already meets.

      Other applicants are having to establish whole new operations in the US for the first time ever. That takes a while. This kind of manufacturing needs a bit more than 4 walls, a roof, and some machines.

      Grant announcements for Intel shouldn’t be too far out. Their plan is for a whole new plant which requires more planning than the route BAE went with.

      • filoria@lemmy.ml
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        1
        arrow-down
        2
        ·
        2 years ago

        They’re being “paid” to establish operations in the US… Except they’re not being paid.

        • Zipitydew@sh.itjust.works
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          2
          ·
          2 years ago

          And? Why would they receive the grants before conditions are met?

          Are you suggesting these corporations should be given the benefits without doing anything?

          • filoria@lemmy.ml
            link
            fedilink
            arrow-up
            1
            arrow-down
            1
            ·
            2 years ago

            They’ve met the conditions of their contract. The US gov is just being extremely slow.

    • carl_marks[use name]@lemmy.ml
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      1
      ·
      2 years ago

      Iirc Nvidia received a bunch from CHIPS too, and had to limit exports of their A100s in to China in return. A little later their managers got fat bonuses and now are working to bypass that export ban lel

  • PowerCrazy@lemmy.ml
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    11
    arrow-down
    5
    ·
    2 years ago

    Weird how subsidizing “the free market” without regulation and plenty of loopholes doesn’t achieve the reported outcome. Maybe if we hired some more capitalist lobbyists to write our neo-liberal policies, we would end up with policies that are more substantial then just giving public money to private industry.

      • ralphio@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        1
        ·
        2 years ago

        Mainly when people talk about this they mean privatization through some convoluted scheme. Look up some of Thatcher’s policies for some out there examples. Outsourcing supply chains is a big part of this privatization, and probably what the commenter meant was that not funding domestic chip production led to this mess.