• novibe@lemmy.ml
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      21
      arrow-down
      3
      ·
      11 months ago

      Bro…… you can’t have a functioning democracy with an anti-democratic party freely participating in it. If a party’s explicit goal is to end democracy, they really SHOULDN’T be allowed to participate in democracy at all.

      Paradox of tolerance and all…

      Democracy shouldn’t be a free-for-all, where warlords can win enough votes to conquer the world. That is insane.

    • SomeGuy69@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      16
      arrow-down
      3
      ·
      11 months ago

      It’s not hypocrisy because AfD is racist and anti-democratic. There’s no paradox here. No tolerance for intolerance, if you let a party be part of the democratic process who is trying to destroy it, you stop have a working democracy. Only a fool would let this happen. Banning AfD doesn’t suddenly shift Germany into a pseudo democracy, we have many more parties.

      However we can also agree that this is just hiding a bigger issue. So it’s no solution and is only gaining time to solve a deeper rooted issue.

    • 5714@lemmy.dbzer0.com
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      6
      arrow-down
      1
      ·
      edit-2
      11 months ago

      “[…] and its almost exclusively a phenomena specific to the left…”

      What about the KPD 1956 or the German Autumn then? This party and movement also represented

      “a portion of the population”

      that was excluded from polls or ‘participation’.

      The paradox of tolerance, the historical fragility of each rule of law, the separation of powers and the constitutional state ( ‘Rechtstaat’ ) render parties and movements whose alignment aim for the qualitative destruction of these markers of political entities built to survive more than one election as not just risks, but dangers to regional democracy.