• teft@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    83
    arrow-down
    3
    ·
    11 months ago

    Ctrl-shift-esc will open the task manager directly. None of that Carl alt del nonsense.

      • jaybone@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        6
        ·
        11 months ago

        I assume this terminology originally referred to an actual interrupt handled by a kernel interrupt handler, and half of the people in this thread have no idea what that means.

      • chuckleslord@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        5
        arrow-down
        8
        ·
        edit-2
        11 months ago

        That’s so dumb, but okay.

        Edit: dumb that using the shortcut to open the task manager doesn’t interrupt the system. That’s what ctrl-alt-del did before windows 8 or whenever, open the task manager regardless of what was happening. Now I have to use that annoying lock-screen menu to open the task manager to kill processes if things are locked up. Didn’t know that, horribly unintuitive

          • chuckleslord@lemmy.world
            link
            fedilink
            arrow-up
            3
            arrow-down
            1
            ·
            edit-2
            11 months ago

            If your computer is locked up, you have to use ctrl-alt-del, with its menu of options including the task manager, in order to interrupt the current processes locking up the system.

            Using ctrl-shift-esc launches the task manager program without a system interrupt, meaning it won’t unlock the computer. Which is dumb, because why else would I be opening the task manager other than to interrupt some out-of-control process? I guess you could be using it to monitor or something else, but that’s what I’m used to opening the task manager to be doing. I didn’t even realize this until this comment.

            • force@lemmy.world
              link
              fedilink
              arrow-up
              1
              arrow-down
              1
              ·
              edit-2
              11 months ago

              then just press ctrl alt del if you want a system interrupt??? there’s a reason they have bindings for both. it’s not much harder, the task manager doesn’t exist solely for killing some program that won’t respond.

  • BigDanishGuy@sh.itjust.works
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    19
    ·
    11 months ago

    Had a beast of a desktop machine back in 2000, it could even decode DVD real-time. But sometimes DVD playback would hang. Pushing the power button 5s would switch off the machine, but 3-4s would get DVD playback working again.

    That’s how I learned that the road to success is to bully and intimidate… At least your hardware

    • barsoap@lemm.ee
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      4
      ·
      11 months ago

      Back in the 00s, when you told Windows to sort a big directory by modified date or so it would take ages, but be faster when you scrolled up and down. That’s still the case. Presumably that’s because explorer will launch more concurrent “get file metadata” tasks. Overall it’s still slow, though.

      It’s actually not NTFS’s fault, but explorer: Nushell gets file metadata in at most 1/100th of the time (the sorting itself is negligible), Linux is still faster at handling NTFS than windows even then, though, nushell on windows is merely fast enough to not be annoying.

  • bulwark@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    18
    ·
    edit-2
    11 months ago

    Remember how Volkswagen got in trouble a few years back for faking emissions when the car detected it was being tested. It would interesting to see if something like that could exist with RAM and task manager.

    • naticus@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      2
      ·
      11 months ago

      Yeah, I hate how multi-process apps never really show their memory usage very well anymore in Task Manager. Been using Process Explorer since before Russinovich sold to Microsoft and it’s easily been the best one I’ve used on Windows to get a better picture of what is going wrong.

  • Dizzy Devil Ducky@lemm.ee
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    13
    arrow-down
    2
    ·
    11 months ago

    Yeah, windows task manager doesn’t do shit if you are already low on resources. My desktop doesn’t have a lot of resources to be used up and there have been a few times task manager is just as bad as the programs I want it to kill due to lack of resources.

    • marcos@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      8
      ·
      edit-2
      11 months ago

      It will very gladly show you all the resources are being consumed by some service you don’t need, can’t uninstall or disable, and will just consume more resources by restarting if you terminate the process.

  • problematicPanther@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    9
    ·
    11 months ago

    what i really want, what i really need, is just a windows equivalent to xkill. window not responding? ctrl+alt+esc, click. it’s dead along with its entire family.

  • The Cooking Senpai@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    7
    ·
    11 months ago

    I am still convince that soon or after they will discover an hidden function in Windows that overclock briefly every component when task manager is opened

  • shalva97@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    3
    ·
    11 months ago

    I have never opened task manager after I added second 16GB RAM stick. It just all works okay, I don’t even have to close programs.