Chriszz@lemmy.world to > Greentext@lemmy.ml · 2 years agoAnon is completely sanelemmy.worldimagemessage-square55fedilinkarrow-up1627arrow-down141
arrow-up1586arrow-down1imageAnon is completely sanelemmy.worldChriszz@lemmy.world to > Greentext@lemmy.ml · 2 years agomessage-square55fedilink
minus-squarecryptosporidium140@sh.itjust.workslinkfedilinkarrow-up4·2 years agoWho still buys tobacco?
minus-squarecryptosporidium140@sh.itjust.workslinkfedilinkarrow-up2·2 years agoIt’s rhetorical, it just seemed to fit well with your question
minus-squareLemmyKnowsBest@lemmy.worldlinkfedilinkarrow-up1·2 years agointeresting & weird since tobacco is exhorbitantly expensive. How can poor people afford it?
minus-squareAbucketofpuppies@lemmy.worldlinkfedilinkarrow-up2·2 years agoMaybe you swapped the cause and effect. Instead of “How do poor people smoke” you could ask “Why are smokers poor”. And then you’ve already answered your question
minus-squareLemmyKnowsBest@lemmy.worldlinkfedilinkarrow-up2·2 years agoOne problem causes the other until it’s impossible to determine which problem came first. It’s a snake eating its own tail.
Who still buys tobacco?
Why are you asking me?
Fine then, keep your secrets
It’s rhetorical, it just seemed to fit well with your question
The poor (statistically)
interesting & weird since tobacco is exhorbitantly expensive. How can poor people afford it?
Maybe you swapped the cause and effect. Instead of “How do poor people smoke” you could ask “Why are smokers poor”.
And then you’ve already answered your question
One problem causes the other until it’s impossible to determine which problem came first. It’s a snake eating its own tail.