• OsrsNeedsF2P@lemmy.ml
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    35
    ·
    1 year ago

    Here in SK right now (yes it’s 4:30am), everyone’s against it but no one knows the data. Once people see the data they’re like “oh”.

    South Korea has an inherent hatred for Japan, so this isn’t surprising at all.

    • lntl@lemmy.ml
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      14
      arrow-down
      1
      ·
      1 year ago

      The Japanese did some pretty radical things during the occupation. It’s interesting to see the ripple effects of these policies so far into the future.

    • socsa@lemmy.ml
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      2
      ·
      1 year ago

      They aren’t dumping it. They dug miles of caves below the sea floor and are pumping the filtered water into the caves slowly over the span of decades. That’s why this whole thing is very dumb. Japan is taking enormous measures to do this safely.

  • socsa@lemmy.ml
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    1
    ·
    1 year ago

    This whole thing would legitimately be the stupidest story of the decade in any decade where Donald Trump isn’t making daily headlines.

  • UnfortunateShort@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    3
    arrow-down
    2
    ·
    1 year ago

    The country was nuked twice and hit with one of the worst nuclear disasters ever. I’m gonna go ahead and trust them with that water

  • lntl@lemmy.ml
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    1
    arrow-down
    11
    ·
    edit-2
    1 year ago

    Dumping is illegal where I live, you’ll get a fine ;)

    Jokes aside, does anyone with a chemistry/physics background know of a technical solution/alternative to dumping? I suspect Japan would not dump nuclear waste in their domestic waters if they could avoid it.

    • its_prolly_fine@sh.itjust.works
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      16
      ·
      1 year ago

      They have treated the waste water, so it isn’t dumping. The water is well below the recommended parameters for releasing water.

      There is nothing wrong with this. People are just freaking out because its “nuclear waste”, which causes people to be irrational.

      • lntl@lemmy.ml
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        1
        arrow-down
        6
        ·
        1 year ago

        Idk why the downvotes, I’m actually curious about this. Do you know how the waste is treated? I have a some education in radioactive materials and it doesn’t seem like an easy problem to solve.

        • PowerCrazy@lemmy.ml
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          5
          arrow-down
          2
          ·
          edit-2
          1 year ago

          If you have some “education about radioactive materials” you’d know that the half-life of tritium is 12.5years and that it is a beta emitter. This type of radiation isn’t harmful unless ingested. You would also know that the water has been diluted to safe levels before being released in the ocean, and even after that dilution, it will also not be released all at once, further reducing the chance of re-concentration and making radiation poisoning impossible. Finally since this is tritium we are talking about it, it isn’t a bio-accumlator and if you did drink too much tritated water, the treatment would be to drink an increased amount of tap water.

          Since you are still just “asking questions,” about how Tritrated water is “treated” it kind of sounds like you don’t actually know about radioactive materials at all otherwise you would know about H3, i.e. tritium and wouldn’t be concerned about “treatment” only the concentration of the released water.

            • Maalus@lemmy.world
              link
              fedilink
              arrow-up
              5
              arrow-down
              2
              ·
              1 year ago

              Cause you deserve it. You lie about your background and act as if you are “just asking questions” when in reality all you are doing to other people is saying “I’m an expert and treating this waste is impossible so how are they doing it”.

              • lntl@lemmy.ml
                link
                fedilink
                arrow-up
                1
                arrow-down
                8
                ·
                1 year ago

                Still with the nasty…

                No one deserves to be spoken to that way. Do better.

                I’m educated enough to know it’s not necessarily a trivial process. The “treating waste is impossible” schtick are your words, not mine.

                Let me get it straight. You’re telling us that:

                • beta emitters aren’t so bad
                • the treatment process (which is what I asked about) is dilution

                Is that right? Dilution is the only “treatment” applied before discharge?

                • blterrible@lemmy.ml
                  link
                  fedilink
                  English
                  arrow-up
                  5
                  ·
                  1 year ago

                  They settle out all of the heavier radioactive elements. They then dilute the remaining heavy water with additional water to drive the level of tritium to an acceptable level. It is then dumped into the ocean and rapidly mixes with the surrounding seawater. If you were to look at a map of ocean currents you’d see generally where it would go from there, but it doesn’t really matter because tritium isn’t really a significant concern. If they were dumping significant quantities of cobalt 60 you should care more, but they aren’t, so you shouldn’t.

    • blterrible@lemmy.ml
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      4
      ·
      1 year ago

      The radioactive component is mostly tritium. As long as they get almost all of the heavy radioactive elements, the hydrogen isotopes are basically harmless in the quantities we’re talking about here. The ocean is a very, very big place.