This is a major escalation that could greatly expand the war and drag hezbollah deeper into the war, which was already involved in skirmishes with Israel in Lebanese regions that Israel occupies.
Note: the verbiage of the article is minimizing the focus on Israel, and they spend half the article justifying the attack as “not an attack on Israel” an effort to minimize how much of an escalation this is.
You know how fucked up this is when you change the country and you would know your bias.
Lets try:
Israil bombed Syria. Israil bombed Jordan. Israil bombed Egypt. Israil bombed Iraq.
See no one cares…
Isreal bombed Saudi Arabia. Isreal bombed Iran.
Now this might start a war but still not bad.
Isreal bombed Rome. Isreal bombed London. Isreal bombed Washington.
You see now there is feelings attached, so now take the feelings and apply them to a regular citizens of Lebanon.
Now the response of these citzen if they did something will get labeled by your government to be anti-semtisim but in reality it doesn’t matter if they were Jew, Christian, or even Muslims Arabs… the hate when other countries bomb your own is the same…
You tried 9 times and still couldn’t get the name of the country right.
Your points are still fair.
Isnotreal
The burn isreal
Nothing to do with ‘feelings’. Simply implausible because London, Washington, and Rome don’t have governments harbouring, supporting or even in league with people literally terrorizing Israel atm.
Does Israel have a long term strategy other than “kill them all”? Is there any point where they want to coexist with us?
No need to answer. Studying the history of colonialism and ethnic cleansing in North America and Australia provides us with a clue to what they would do if they could.
I think Israel lives on its people considering Arabs their enemy. It makes them tolerate a lot more from their government that they otherwise wouldn’t.
I think they rather suffocate Palestinians slowly rather than end them all at once.
Sounds like someone doesn’t like ‘finding out’ as much as they thought they would.
Nothing justifies war crimes but this is exactly what we expected from Israel. Anyone who knows it’s true self expected this. The Palestinian resistance was betting on it expanding to a regional conflict.
Could Israel Carry Out Another Nakba?
Expulsionist sentiment is common in Israeli society and politics. To ignore the warning signs is to abdicate responsibility.
April 19, 2023
https://jewishcurrents.org/could-israel-carry-out-another-nakba
The mistake was [some of us Arabs] assuming they’d ever change if we made peace with them.
It might have something to do with your flawed idea of what ‘make peace’ means.
Maybe this is the beginning of the Great Filter.
How is this different than Russia/Ukraine?
Note: the verbiage of the article is minimizing the focus on Israel, and they spend half the article justifying the attack as “not an attack on Israel” an effort to minimize how much of an escalation this is.
Note: The verbiage of the article is like that because it’s Reuters, and is reporting only the known facts without any speculation or hyperbole
OP is most likely more used to tabloid journalism and people screeching their opinions, and so reads articles in a biased mindset
The article is full of speculation, opinions and commentary instead of merely presenting facts.
I’ve just reread it, and I still don’t see any speculation. They do quote certain sources, but name the sources so you can judge for yourself if they’re telling the truth or not. Again, not hyperbole, but direct quotes
If you reject Reuters and Associated Press as sources, you’ll end up far more ill-informed, not less, and you’d be incredibly ignorant to dismiss them as biased
It looks like the article was updated since I last read it, with the headline changed and a lot more information added, so maybe my claim is not true anymore. But I will tell you what bothered me about it initially anyways.
“whoever did it, it must be clear: That this was not an attack on the Lebanese state.”
“Whoever did this did a surgical strike against the Hamas leadership,” Regev said in the interview.
Those lines are heavily speculative commententary rather than “facts”, aiming to downplay how much of an escalation this is. Those lines are found very high up in the 5th paragraph. It’s the first commentary after saying that Israel refused to comment, and originally there was much less details presented.
Moreover, the article’s headline (now changed) was something along the lines of “deputy Hamas chief killed in Beirut by blast”. This verbiage has now been changed to “Israeli drone kills deputy Hamas chief”, which is much better. The original is downplaying Israel’s role.
One last comment, pointing out biases in Reuters does not mean I ignore them. Every source is biased one way or another, and I still read them (refer to the very post you’re commenting on), albeit with skepticism, carefully scanning for the facts and evidence.
deleted by creator
Why does every second comment get deleted by a moderator??
Removed by mod
How can you see deleted comments?
I use Memmy and I am on a different instance
The more Hamas that Israel can eliminate, the better.
Israel can’t eliminate Hamas, but they’re effective at targeting 5 year old children.
Eliminate Hamas? The only thing they are doing now is making sure Hamas gets even more recruits at this point! This war is the best thing that happened to Hamas. They get so much attention now and for every person killed there will be 10 more that will fighr against the zionists.
Why are people downvoting you? I don’t particularly like Israel’s government, but Hamas is even worse. It’s killing civilians on both sides that is bad.
How is Hamas worse than Israel? Have Hamas killed 20.000 Israelis? No.
The problem with Israel’s current strategy is that for every terrorist they kill, they are making 10 new recruits among the relatives of innocents who were killed in the bombing. This is going to backfire and make things worse for everyone involved.
Can the moderator who removed this entire conversation please tell us which rule we broke? It seemed quite on topic for the post.
Rule 1, apparently
