• EatATaco@lemm.ee
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          1
          ·
          1 year ago

          But there are tons of other ales. It’s not like it’s just IPA or you have to lager.

      • gerbler@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        5
        ·
        1 year ago

        They take less time to brew than a pilsner so when you only have a small capacity you can churn out more product if you’re targeting IPAs. This is generally why (beyond the general trend) microbreweries will opt for IPAs over lagers.

        • WoahWoah@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          3
          arrow-down
          1
          ·
          1 year ago

          I’ve brewed both styles. You’re right that lagering adds a step and not doing it adds significant time to the brewing process, but in terms of the volume at a brewery, that’s really only a one-off time delay. After it’s in a brewing rotation, lagering doesn’t add time to a production schedule. It’s more about storage space and equipment at that point.

          IPAs can be significantly more difficult to brew, so if you’re talking about a one-off brew, IPAs are harder to make WELL but faster to brew. Pilsner is easier to make well, but can take longer and/or require an additional step (lagering).

    • EatATaco@lemm.ee
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      1
      ·
      1 year ago

      Pale ales are easier and cheaper to make than IPAs. They make IPAs because they are popular, not because they are easy.