• paultimate14@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    71
    arrow-down
    8
    ·
    1 year ago

    I was having a hard time imagining which company this could be. Not that I’m a fan of Verizon or Comcast, but I think they know what side their bread is buttered on. Which one wouldn’t?

    Then I remembered Starlink exists.

    • Linkerbaan@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      131
      arrow-down
      2
      ·
      1 year ago

      Don’t think they were colluding with the provider. They probably just put a burner sim card into a 4g module and sent data over a VPN to China whenever it had signal.

      • postmateDumbass@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        4
        ·
        1 year ago

        The blurb says primarily for navigation.

        So it was using the starlink signals like gps signal and therefore they needed to correlate with the carrier to get a rough time sync.

        I wonder what timing data is freely available on the starlink acquisition signal.

        • Linkerbaan@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          3
          arrow-down
          1
          ·
          edit-2
          1 year ago

          Why would they need data then? With GPS can get a 1metre accurate chip for like 20 bucks and it’s way smaller. And no need for any carrier or subscription.

          • postmateDumbass@lemmy.world
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            1
            ·
            1 year ago

            Mapping out network topology? Who knows.

            Whatever the collected data was, it could have been sent to their satellites for long haul back home.

  • Tier 1 Build-A-Bear 🧸@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    24
    arrow-down
    1
    ·
    1 year ago

    Wait, you mean US corporations will take money to do questionable things? Surprised Pikachu face.

    Maybe the US government shouldn’t have set the precedent that that was EXPECTED AND ENCOURAGED

    • Lazhward@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      5
      ·
      1 year ago

      Didn’t that turn out to be a weather balloon launched by an amateur meteorology club?

      • nrezcm@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        7
        arrow-down
        1
        ·
        1 year ago

        No that ended up being swamp gas from a weather balloon trapped in a thermal pocket which reflected light from Venus. Pretty common mistake.

  • deafboy@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    17
    arrow-down
    7
    ·
    1 year ago

    I’ll have a good laugh if it turns out the baloon was not chinese after all, it has just contained some iot device with previously unknown call home function to collect diagnostic data.

  • Zoidberg@lemm.ee
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    3
    ·
    1 year ago

    The PCC must be feeling all smart about their spy balloon design choices. Just wait until they need to talk to Comcast customer support…

  • mlg@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    12
    arrow-down
    37
    ·
    1 year ago

    Can’t wait for the final report in 10 years that confirms it was a weather balloon and some dumbass CO was too excited and wanted to see an AIM-9x get used on a static 10mph moving target.

    Pentagon really running out of fun ideas to waste tax dollars.

    Could have at least used the 20mm guns included in the F22 instead of $500,000

    • DontTreadOnBigfoot@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      12
      ·
      1 year ago

      Could have at least used the *20mm guns

      No, you really can’t.

      The Canadians tried with an F-18. They shot the absolute shit out of a balloon with its Vulcan, but because they aren’t under pressure like your typical party balloon, it didn’t really do much.