China’s disinterest in Red Sea policing role underscores Beijing’s reluctance to back its rhetoric on Middle East peace with substantive action.

The Chinese government appears to be brushing off Secretary of State Antony Blinken’s call for Beijing to assist an international coalition in protecting commercial shipping in the Red Sea from Yemen’s Iran-backed Houthi militias.

Beijing signaled that it has no interest in joining the Pentagon’s Operation Prosperity Guardian , a multinational force including Canada, the United Kingdom and Bahrain, in providing security for cargo ships under threat of Houthi attack.

“We believe relevant parties, especially major countries with influence, need to play a constructive and responsible role in keeping the shipping lanes safe in the Red Sea,” Chinese Foreign Ministry spokesperson Wang Wenbin said on Thursday in an indirect reference to U.S. military and diplomatic heft in the region.

  • Justas🇱🇹@sh.itjust.works
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    4
    arrow-down
    1
    ·
    1 year ago

    The reality is that the Chinese have very limited power projection capabilities and could not help anyone in the Red Sea if their future depended on it.

    • Why9@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      5
      arrow-down
      4
      ·
      1 year ago

      How can you possibly arrive at this conclusion? There’s no evidence for this whatsoever.

      The US asking for China’s help is also a way of getting China to reveal what kind of arsenal it has at its disposal. China staying out if it makes perfect sense.

      This conflict would stop if the US stopped supplying Israel, and condemned them and imposed sanctions on them. Following an Israeli ceasefire, the houthis would have no reason to continue their attacks and the problem would be resolved.

    • R0cket_M00se@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      2
      arrow-down
      2
      ·
      1 year ago

      Yeah cause the Chinese government doesn’t have a history of eliminating ethnic groups in labor camps, they’re SO morally superior.

      • Linkerbaan@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        5
        arrow-down
        1
        ·
        1 year ago

        When whataboutism is the only resort left.

        The Chinese concentration camps are bad though wish they’d stop that shit.

        • R0cket_M00se@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          1
          arrow-down
          3
          ·
          1 year ago

          It’s not even close to the only resort, I’m just choosing to specifically target your claim that they’re based just because they’ve always backed Iran and the radical Arab factions in the middle east and continue to do so as expected.

          • Linkerbaan@lemmy.world
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            3
            arrow-down
            3
            ·
            edit-2
            1 year ago

            Their actions in this matter are however on a massive moral high ground over the west which are now doing actual Nazi style genocide shit.

            Sure China only doesn’t interfere because it aligns with their political interests. But they’re still not doing genocide. And the Houthis blocking global shipping lanes costs China money too.

            That the west wants to throw away their entire global reputation to create some biblical world ending is their own fault.