I think it’s pretty safe to say that the majority of us are here to avoid another corporate takeover of our preferred platforms. It would seem to me to be a tad irresponsible to allow Facebook into our space with open arms, allowing them to hoover up our data. I would love to keep using Lemmy.world, but will happily change instances if need be, and I feel many share that sentiment.

  • Ghostalmedia@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    150
    arrow-down
    9
    ·
    edit-2
    1 year ago

    Well, right now Meta is pushing, not pulling. Meaning, Threads content can be displayed on Masto, but not the other way around.

    IMHO, the bigger threat is having Threads content completely dominate other activity pub clients. Other clients / communities could get dependent on it. Then Meta is basically a drug dealer with leverage.

    Data collection doesn’t bother me too much. I’m not going to install their client and all of the behavior trackers that come with it, and my activity pub content is already freely available to query on the internet. If they want it, they already have access to it. Everyone does.

      • Ghostalmedia@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        35
        arrow-down
        2
        ·
        1 year ago

        Correct. This is an issue for Masto, not Lemmy. It may never be an issue for Lemmy for all we know. Lemmy is focused on following activity pub communities not individual people.

      • infinitepcg@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        4
        arrow-down
        1
        ·
        1 year ago

        Interesting. It seems that Lemmy can see Mastodon users and send private messages to them. And I believe Mastodon users can create Lemmy posts, so potentially Threads users could do that too once Meta enables two-way communication.

        • Microw@lemm.ee
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          1
          ·
          1 year ago

          It all depends on how the Meta teams implements ActivityPub and which parts of it.

    • webjukebox@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      28
      arrow-down
      10
      ·
      1 year ago

      Data collection doesn’t bother me too much. I’m not going to install their client and all of the behavior trackers that come with it, and my activity pub content is already freely available to query on the internet. If they want it, they already have access to it. Everyone does.

      I will be able to follow and see friends’ posts and sports teams’ posts through Mastodon without needing a Meta account nor install their shitty apps.

      All I posted via fediverse is public already, traveling into some obscure instances, so I don’t care if Meta uses or shares my public posts.

    • AustralianSimon@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      12
      arrow-down
      1
      ·
      1 year ago

      This, the real threat is the amount of content that federates out possibly hurting others servers’ performance as their enterprise kit will scale better.

    • Rognaut@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      9
      arrow-down
      2
      ·
      1 year ago

      I like your perspective. More people need to realize that they are responsible for what they put out there.

    • Tiger Jerusalem@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      5
      ·
      1 year ago

      Threads content completely dominate other activity pub clients. Other clients / communities could get dependent on it. Then Meta is basically a drug dealer with leverage.

      How? Because this doesn’t make an yota of sense to me.

      Flipboard federated. Are you flooded with news from them?

    • kim (she/her)@lemmy.ml
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      1
      arrow-down
      1
      ·
      1 year ago

      even if they are only “pushing”, there will still need to be profile data exchanged with Threads in order to access it, if they have http signatures enabled (i.e. authorized fetch under mastodon)