Rep. Ayanna Pressley of Massachusetts and Sen. Peter Welch of Vermont submitted the legislation, named the Inclusive Democracy Act, on Tuesday which would guarantee the right to vote in federal elections for all citizens regardless of their criminal record.

In a statement, Pressley said the legislation was necessary due to policies and court rulings that “continue to disenfranchise voters from all walks of life — including by gutting the Voting Rights Act, gerrymandering, cuts to early voting, and more.” Welch called the bill necessary due to “antiquated state felony disenfranchisement laws.”

In late 2022, approximately 4.6 million people were unable to vote due to a felony conviction, according to a study by the Sentencing Project, a nonpartisan research group. The same study found that Black and Hispanic citizens are disproportionately likely to be disenfranchised due to felony

  • query@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    44
    ·
    edit-2
    1 year ago

    They should all be able to vote. From prison, too. The punishment never needs to be to take their voting rights away. If they commit fraud, stop them from committing fraud again.

    • surewhynotlem@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      12
      arrow-down
      4
      ·
      1 year ago

      I think if you’re overthrowing the government, you’re basically tapping out of the democracy. That’s literally the only crime I could see not being allowed to vote. I also think they should be removed from the country they tried to destroy. But then I have no idea how would they remain detained in that situation.

        • Jax@sh.itjust.works
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          3
          arrow-down
          4
          ·
          edit-2
          1 year ago

          So we just make them legitimate sovereign citizens?

          What happens when they start to organize and try to create a new country within the United States?

          Edit: weird downvotes, I’m asking questions

          • Mobiuthuselah@lemm.ee
            link
            fedilink
            arrow-up
            5
            ·
            1 year ago

            What’s your understanding of “sovereign citizen”? Asking in good faith.

            I mean, we have Amish in the US. That’s a kind of sovereign citizen, right?

            • ryathal@sh.itjust.works
              link
              fedilink
              arrow-up
              1
              ·
              1 year ago

              The Amish are just members of a fairly extreme religion. They don’t reject the existence of government itself. Sovereign citizens are people that believe they aren’t subject to the laws of the country the reside in.

            • Jax@sh.itjust.works
              link
              fedilink
              arrow-up
              1
              ·
              1 year ago

              Well I’m basing it off of the google definition…

              Sovereign citizens believe they are not under the jurisdiction of the federal government and consider themselves exempt from U.S. law. They use a variety of conspiracy theories and falsehoods to justify their beliefs and their activities, some of which are illegal and violent.

              I mean we’d basically be making them the same thing, no? Only legitimate?

    • logicbomb@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      6
      ·
      1 year ago

      I’d prefer compulsory voting from all able people of voting age. Prisons should have full in-person voting locations with private voting booths. Mail-in ballots should be a freely available option for all.

      It doesn’t guarantee good results, but I feel it is the most straightforward way to rid ourselves of voter suppression campaigns, which I think are fundamentally evil.

        • Flying Squid@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          6
          ·
          1 year ago

          It’s not much of a tax when it can be “paid” by sending a piece of paper through the mail, postage-paid.

          Australia does this. It works out very well.

                • Flying Squid@lemmy.world
                  link
                  fedilink
                  arrow-up
                  3
                  ·
                  1 year ago

                  Do you think that’s how it works in Australia, where voting is compulsory? Or do you think they’ve found ways to accommodate for that?

                  • PsychedSy@sh.itjust.works
                    link
                    fedilink
                    arrow-up
                    1
                    ·
                    1 year ago

                    I’d hope they accommodate for it. I don’t trust the US government to not fuck it up.

                    Personally I hate the concept of compulsory almost anything. If you have a right to vote you have a right to protest elections as well.