FBI Director Christopher Wray said Tuesday he has never seen a time during his decades-long career when so many threats against the US were all as elevated as they are now, warning senators he sees “blinking lights everywhere.”

During a hearing before the Senate Judiciary Committee, ranking Republican member of the committee, Lindsey Graham of South Carolina, asked Wray if he saw “blinking red lights” — referring to warning signs the US missed before the attack of 9/11.

“I see blinking lights everywhere I turn,” Wray said.

Wray also said that the bureau is working “around the clock” to “identify and disrupt” potential attacks by individuals inspired by the Hamas attacks on October 7.

  • xenomor@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    41
    arrow-down
    3
    ·
    1 year ago

    I 100% expect that such warnings will motivate the US to further reign in freedoms and discriminate against specific ethnic groups rather that spark any meaningful introspection about the policies that are the fundamental cause of such threats.

  • ImTryingLemmy@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    37
    arrow-down
    1
    ·
    1 year ago

    We recommend you use a different browser or disable the “EasyList Cookie” filter from your “Content Filtering” settings (found under “Settings” -> “Shields” in the Brave Browser).

    Fuck off, CNN

  • girlfreddy@sh.itjust.works
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    18
    arrow-down
    3
    ·
    1 year ago

    “What are we going to say to the family whose loved one’s care was sabotaged when a hospital was taken offline by a foreign adversary and the FBI wasn’t able to stop the cyber attack,” Wray said.

    I abhor when individuals, who should know fucking better, start pulling shit like this.

    If he has proof, show it. But don’t use fear-mongering or start pulling at America’s heart strings to justify monitoring America.

    • shalafi@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      10
      arrow-down
      9
      ·
      edit-2
      1 year ago

      Did you even read the preceding paragraph?

      The FBI director is pushing senators on reauthorizing Section 702 of the Foreign Intelligence Surveillance Act, which is set to expire at the end of this year. The law enables the US government to obtain intelligence by targeting non-Americans overseas who are using US-based communications services.

      https://www.dni.gov/files/icotr/Section702-Basics-Infographic.pdf

      I am A-OK with this. And if anyone wants to argue that they will break the law and abuse this, what’s the difference? If they intend to break the law, they will do so with or without this provision.

      • NAK@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        7
        arrow-down
        1
        ·
        1 year ago

        You’re hand waving how it’s actually implemented.

        Like if you want to tap a wire you can do that. It’s not hard.

        If you want to selectively listen to communications happening on that wire you still start by tapping the wire. Then you listen to everything and filer out what you need.

        I’m unfamiliar with how this is currently done, obviously. But if the difference here is the FBI not using their taps, or the taps being completely removed when this expires that is a meaningful difference. And should be discussed.

        • SCB@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          1
          ·
          1 year ago

          Man if you want you’re fuckin mind blown (not necessarily in a great way), Google the SENTIENT program.

        • shalafi@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          1
          arrow-down
          2
          ·
          1 year ago

          I swear I’m not being obtuse on purpose, but the idea is to spy on non-Americans outside the US. What are you saying they’re doing instead?

          • MIDItheKID@lemmy.world
            link
            fedilink
            arrow-up
            5
            ·
            1 year ago

            Like that time John Brennan the, director of the CIA literally said “We’re all aware of executive order 12333. That order prohibits the CIA from engaging in domestic spying and searches of US citizens within our borders.” and then Edward Snowden dropped a huge truth bomb and revealed that they were indeed drag netting information on anybody and everybody including innocent US citizens?

            Yeah… There’s no way they would do something like that again, right?

          • girlfreddy@sh.itjust.works
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            3
            ·
            1 year ago

            However, Americans’ data may get picked up as part of incidental collection. That means that if an American is communicating with a foreign target, those communications could be collected. In addition, if federal authorities are already investigating a US person, they may cross-check that person’s information against the 702 database.

            Source

  • TheRealKuni@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    13
    arrow-down
    5
    ·
    1 year ago

    Is it possible he’s just confused by the fancy LED Christmas lights everyone has now?

    • Cosmic Cleric@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      12
      arrow-down
      1
      ·
      1 year ago

      Typical cop talk. There is crime everywhere, and my department needs more money to stop it.

      Both could be true (real ‘blinking red lights’ problems, as well as farming Congress for more money).

      • 1847953620@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        4
        arrow-down
        2
        ·
        1 year ago

        They could both be untrue. Or only one of them. They could even have different degrees of truth. So many options, such little time.

        • Cosmic Cleric@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          3
          arrow-down
          1
          ·
          1 year ago

          Typical cop talk. There is crime everywhere, and my department needs more money to stop it.

          Both could be true (real ‘blinking red lights’ problems, as well as farming Congress for more money).

          They could both be untrue. Or only one of them. They could even have different degrees of truth. So many options, such little time.

          Thats a nonsensical response. What exactly is the point that you’re trying to make?

          • 1847953620@lemmy.world
            link
            fedilink
            arrow-up
            1
            arrow-down
            1
            ·
            1 year ago

            It’s not nonsensical, you’re nonsensical. I’m just joining in and trying to be thorough about the hypotheticals we’re listing, here. 😬

  • YoBuckStopsHere@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    1
    arrow-down
    2
    ·
    1 year ago

    Far too many industries replaced people for automation and now it has made them vulnerable to outside threats.

    • kromem@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      7
      ·
      1 year ago

      Oh my gosh - maybe it’s a conspiracy!?!

      Or maybe there really is an elevated risk of radicalized individuals trying to emulate a recent successful terrorist attack in Western nations.

      Things can not be a coincidence for a variety of reasons, including the officially stated ones.

    • Fades@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      3
      ·
      1 year ago

      What a moronic comment, there’s nothing coincidental about it; violence is on the rise globally