• TheLurker@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    1
    arrow-down
    8
    ·
    1 year ago

    Do we want this to be the equivalent of editorials?

    That’s basically all media these days and look how fucked they are.

    I’m not asking for it to be peer reviewed, that also sucks based on the current view of the “publish or die” culture of academia.

    I have no easy answers. I only have questions and counterpoints.

      • TheLurker@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        1
        arrow-down
        7
        ·
        1 year ago

        I can’t discount your point of view. But I disagree with it.

        Hunter S, while awesome, was not a journalist. He was a commentator. He injected his perspective into his writing. That isn’t journalism, that is commentary.

        • fossilesque@mander.xyzOP
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          6
          arrow-down
          1
          ·
          edit-2
          1 year ago

          He literally invented Gonzo journalism and pioneered the New Journalism movement, while writing for RS no less, what are you talking about.

          • TheLurker@lemmy.world
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            1
            arrow-down
            4
            ·
            1 year ago

            I mean did you read what I wrote or did you just go into fanboy mode?

            Firstly, Hunter was not the first person to write an opinion piece, or to write from the perspective of the subject. So “inventing” gonzo journalism? What the fuck does that even mean.

            I like his style of writing, but it is commentary. Not journalism.

            Literally the name journalism gives you insight as to what the approach of writing is meant to be. A journal is a series of entries in a book denoting objective facts. Commentary on one’s experiences is called a dairy.