What’s the closest thing we have to a perfect private messanger?

In my mind the perfect private messanger is both completely secure, and also completely anonymous.

All the mainstream messengers can pretty much ensure the contents of the message will not be revealed…but that is not good enough. I want to be able to deploy and establish a completely anonymous AND private channel of communication on a dime without having to jump through extreme operational security hoops.

Does it really exist?

  • hereforawhile@lemmy.mlOP
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    5
    arrow-down
    1
    ·
    10 hours ago

    Simplex does check alot of those boxes… but smp traffic is easily identifiable unless your jumping through the major hoops of establishing a totally anonymous proxy.

    An encoded message on a pastebin through tor. Congratulations, you’ve entered pedophile/terrorist level security realm.

    Thats to bad being anonymous and secure puts you in that category. It shouldn’t!

    • Florencia (she/her)@lemmy.blahaj.zone
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      1
      arrow-down
      8
      ·
      edit-2
      10 hours ago

      Honestly, pedos & terrorists get the whole world cooperation on doxing them. So if they’re not using a tool or method then it’s not proof against nation states.

      Why the need for complete anonymity though? Literally only pedos operate at that level so that nobody can squeal on the others if they are busted (they inevitably need to mess up a real kid because their CSAM isn’t good enough).

      • Lytia @lemmy.today
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        7
        ·
        8 hours ago

        This kind of mindset is what make the privacy community seem like outcasts. Yes, pedophiles and other criminals would benefit from complete anonymity, but that does not mean we should draw the line at how anonymous someone gets to be because “only pedos operate at that level”.

        • rirus@feddit.org
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          2
          ·
          3 hours ago

          Journalist and human rights activists are criminals in certain circumstances. Being a criminal doesn’t mean they are bad.