• MrFinnbean@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    4
    ·
    1 day ago

    So your example is coalation of 50 tripes with council who decites major decitions? Wow. That really sound ground breaking and unique way to govern people.

    Didint their end beging when they could not agree how to respond to British Crown request of aid during the American Revolution?

    • blindbunny@lemmy.ml
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      2
      arrow-down
      3
      ·
      edit-2
      1 day ago

      You act like any state did any better for the people it ruled at the time.

        • blindbunny@lemmy.ml
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          1
          arrow-down
          4
          ·
          1 day ago

          And you failed to show it is at not better? Because of one mistake? While fighting colonialism?

          • MrFinnbean@lemmy.world
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            2
            ·
            23 hours ago

            No. I asked you to prove your point and like i tought you just wanted to bash common modern ways of ruling without offering any concrete alternative.

            The only example you produced was failed coalation of tribes, that was not unique in the eyes of history or especially well functioning alternative to modern goverments.

            You just earlier argued that in any state where somebody has power they will use it wrong. How their system was immune to that?