• thisNotMyName@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    29
    ·
    1 year ago

    Okay, let’s play this game :D Mint, because it’s frickin easy and fulfills all my needs while being stable enough for my work laptop

  • sntx@lemm.ee
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    21
    ·
    1 year ago

    You’re playing Devils Advocate, and you probaly know it xD

    Anyway, I prefer NixOS for it’s declarativity, reproducibility and immutability.

    Example: You want nginx with acme setup? Just tell it to, and NixOS will figure out the steps to reach the desired state.

  • FourThirteen@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    20
    ·
    1 year ago

    Debian, because I can just have a computer without needing to fiddle with a million things. I work in tech and don’t want to mess with any more code or configurations if I’m on my own computer. It’s worked for me for 5 years and has worked for others for 30 years.

  • cheer@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    13
    arrow-down
    1
    ·
    1 year ago

    Fedora is the perfect balance of stable and up-to-date, so that’s what I’m using on my desktop. I’ve got Arch on another laptop too because it’s so easy to use; it has my favorite package manager and basically every program in existence in the AUR.

  • Secret300@sh.itjust.works
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    11
    ·
    1 year ago

    Fedora cause I can’t be bothered to deal with anything distro specific. It stays as close to upstream as it can and I like that

    • Tyler K. Nothing@startrek.website
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      5
      ·
      1 year ago

      Same. I have Fedora 38/39, depending on when I last booted a machine up for updates. Started on Caldera OpenLinux and compiled most everything back in the late 90’s, then moved to Suse, then Ubuntu, then Mint because of Snaps, then Pop_OS!, and now Fedora because it’s like @[email protected] says.

  • CalicoJack@lemmy.dbzer0.com
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    9
    ·
    1 year ago

    Arch or EndeavourOS, depending on the machine’s purpose and my mood at install time. I prefer rolling release, and pacman + AUR is a lovely combination.

  • pgp@sh.itjust.works
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    10
    arrow-down
    1
    ·
    1 year ago

    Fedora, it’s bleeding edge, but stable enough for a daily driver. Also, most things work out of the box.

  • electric_nan@lemmy.ml
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    6
    ·
    1 year ago

    Linux Mint Debian Edition. I mention it a lot on here, but it really is my favorite distro. I have been using Linux a long time, and I’m old. I don’t care to spend a lot of time and effort tweaking and configuring. LMDE gives me everything I need and is usable out of the box, while not standing in my way when I need to get shit done.

  • shrugal@lemm.ee
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    6
    ·
    edit-2
    1 year ago

    Fedora.

    They have solid community and financial backings, they do tremendous work pushing the Linux desktop forward, it’s close to vanilla and the sweet spot between stable and bleeding edge (aka “leading edge”) for me personally.

  • tankplanker@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    6
    ·
    1 year ago

    Servers I run Debian, I do not want flashy I just want stable and tested security fixes.

    I could not hack being that far behind for my desktop OS however (which I run on three different devices), so I run Ubuntu, which I remove as much Ubuntu and Gnome baggage as possible such as snaps and by running Sway.

    I should really swap to a different distro that also has Debian as its root but without the stuff I don’t want and Sway by default. However I also want stuff to be simple and up to date, as I make my money on my desktop PCs, I cannot afford for it to be a PITA every time I try to install patches.

    I do have one PC running arch, but its mostly for the memes (and for PIKVM)

    I did used to be Red Hat through and through. I started with Linux back in 98 using Red Hat CD ROMs, but I left for Debian over some previous controversy that I do not remember now, years before the Centos stuff.

  • s_i_m_s@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    5
    ·
    1 year ago

    Mint (MATE). It’s preconfigured closest to what I want, with just a couple tweeks I can do whatever I need with utilities and a GUI I’m familiar with.

    If Its a headless machine Ubuntu or Debian. Again familiar with both can do whatever on both without having to relearn low to build a wheel.

    Primarily a windows user but I do use Linux for some applications.

    • CraigeryTheKid@lemm.ee
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      2
      ·
      1 year ago

      Interesting to see Ubuntu for headless? Since it’s such a desktop-focused choice. What are your thoughts?

      I ask because right now my desktop and my headless are both PopOS (because I liked it on my desktop), but I was thinking of changing the headless to something lighter.