• Ithral@lemmy.blahaj.zone
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    15
    ·
    12 hours ago

    No, the 3rd amendment means your house/apt can’t be turned into a barracks.

    Refusing service is just how things are, no specific amendment

    • BarneyPiccolo@lemmy.today
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      2
      ·
      6 hours ago

      The 3rd talks about quartering soldiers during times of peace, and the administration is making the claim that these cities are in a state of “war.”

      Also, forcing a private entity to involuntarily open their facilities to soldiers needs, could still be considered a violation of 3A They may not be sleeping, but using toilet facilities could be considered quartering. That’s the sort of thing that would take court precedents to establish, perhaps even the Supreme Court.

    • thatKamGuy@sh.itjust.works
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      3
      ·
      11 hours ago

      Fair enough!

      I don’t know the exact specifics surrounding the denial of access to bathrooms (ie. if they were private residence, commercial business or public access); but in the case of the first two - even if not necessary- either the 3rd or 4th amendments could be used as grounds to legally refuse entry and/or sue in the event of subsequent unlawful trespass.

      Either way, this entire fiasco is just an amusing sideshow to the otherwise absolute carnage that ICE is attempting to wreak upon US cities.

      I just wish I still had enough faith in the political opposition to be able to hold each and every one of these barbarians (starting with Stephen Miller) to account if/when the current regime collapses in on itself.