Israeli foreign ministry posts video of Thunberg’s arrest; vessels carrying about 500 activists intercepted about 75 miles off coast of war-torn territory

  • JackbyDev@programming.dev
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    3
    arrow-down
    1
    ·
    11 hours ago

    Your pedantry on the usage of the term publicity does not align with how people colloquially use the phrase “only for publicity.”

    • Madison420@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      1
      arrow-down
      3
      ·
      10 hours ago

      Oh? Words with specific meanings no longer mean what those words collectively mean because they can also be used to imply something else. You still haven’t said, by what method are they gaining publicity.

      • JackbyDev@programming.dev
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        3
        arrow-down
        1
        ·
        9 hours ago

        It is extremely common for phrases to be used in ways that are different than the strict, literal interpretation of their usage. Yes. The way people use the phrase “only for publicity” is different from the way you’re using it, which is why you’re getting push back.

        • Madison420@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          1
          arrow-down
          3
          ·
          edit-2
          9 hours ago

          Sure it’s common, that’s how colloquialisms work. In this case em using it either way is the same result. “They want publicity” and “they want attention” are effectively the same.

          Read usernames! I didn’t use it like that, I didn’t use it at all for that matter. I’m saying the person who did slant it negatively is fuckin dumb because they mean the same thing in this case. It’s attention for her personally which helps with attention for the causes she’s champions.

          They might mean it negatively but it’s irrelevant.

          which is why you’re getting push back.

          No I’m getting pushback because people like you don’t bother to read before they get outraged. I’m not that person, you need to stop blaming me for someone else’s words.

          Ed: For reference this is the initiating comment and it is in fact not my comment.

          https://aussie.zone/comment/19134271

          • JackbyDev@programming.dev
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            1
            arrow-down
            1
            ·
            7 hours ago

            Read usernames! I didn’t use it like that, I didn’t use it at all for that matter.

            I’m fully aware you’re a different user, but I’m specifically talking about this comment that you made. Emphasis mine.

            They are only doing it for publicity. It’s quite literally getting very publicly arrested to bring light to and test the blockade in court as a matter of international law. What other purpose do you think they have?

            Which is why I said this.

            Your pedantry on the usage of the term publicity does not align with how people colloquially use the phrase “only for publicity.”

            • Madison420@lemmy.world
              link
              fedilink
              English
              arrow-up
              1
              arrow-down
              1
              ·
              edit-2
              6 hours ago

              What is factually incorrect about the quoted comment. I’ll wait.

              Also you left of the part where I made it clear that I would not use it as an implication.

              Ed:

              They are literally doing it for attention, but yes I agree slanting it as a negative is unwise and misleading.

              I’ll put it this way. You’re implying attention seeking behavior is always negative which simply isn’t the case. There have been a number of protestors who set themselves on fire in protest which is unarguably attention seeking behavior. Is that a negative thing to do? My opinion is no.

              • JackbyDev@programming.dev
                link
                fedilink
                English
                arrow-up
                1
                arrow-down
                1
                ·
                4 hours ago

                Like I said already, your usage of the phrase doesn’t align with the way people use it and that’s why you’re getting push back. That’s all I’m saying. I’m implying nothing else.