- cross-posted to:
- [email protected]
- cross-posted to:
- [email protected]
cross-posted from: https://lemmy.ml/post/36860074
By Sean Mathews. Published date: 29 September 2025 19:41 BST | Last update 430pm EDT
“disarming of Hamas” Non starter, never give-up arms. It just gives the oppressor complete control and will only mean that Israel will fully take all the land and murder the people much much easier. Settlers will be able to swarm in and murder even more Palestinians. If your murder is going to happen anyway, then take as many of them as you possibly can.
It’s so funny that these two are “negotiating peace”. Like, did they forget the plot line or something? They aren’t at war. Netanyahu bombed the negotiators with the people that one of them is at war with?! Like, they’re two granpas playing dolls on a public stage and everyone is watching.
Souns like the Palestinians left to live in Gaza under such a plan would become an underclass.
Which isn’t different from the current situation
For over 50 years. Israel is currently a terrorist state
“Gaza will be governed under the temporary transitional governance of a technocratic, apolitical Palestinian committee, responsible for delivering the day-to-day running of public services and municipalities for the people in Gaza,” the White House said.
A “Board of Peace” chaired by Trump, which will include former UK Prime Minister Tony Blair, will have “oversight and supervision” of the Palestinian committee.
The plan says the Palestinian Authority will eventually take over Gaza once it has “completed its reform programme”.
Netanyahu praised Trump for offering to manage the enclave as “Chairman of the Board”, saying: “The fact that you are taking this on helps a lot.”
I’m sorry, I’m sorry, I’m sorry. Back up a bit. Is this “peace” “plan” literally making President Trump the unelected ruler of the Gaza Strip? Not in his role as President of the United States, even, which would be bad enough, but making Trump, personally, the highest authority in Gaza, until he decides Gaza is “reformed” enough for him to surrender power?
Am I reading this right?
Are we going all the way back to the time of Julius Caesar where the leader of Rome could just give himself a province to rule personally?
My what the fuckometer has been consistently overloaded since January 20th, but, really, what the actual fuck?
From what I heard this is what HAMAS or whoever is doing negotiations for Palestinians wants. They know trump is bad, but Netanyahu is worse. They would rather Trumps name be personally tied to their future. Scary that they think that’s their best strategy.
Hirohito accepts Hitler’s plan to end the war in Korea. Resistance must disarm first.
hirohit was a puppet, but could just as easily replace him with the admiralty and it makes me wonder if this is more whitewashing to paint the genociders as “protectors”
“Gaza will be governed under the temporary transitional governance of a technocratic, apolitical Palestinian committee, responsible for delivering the day-to-day running of public services and municipalities for the people in Gaza,” the White House said. A “Board of Peace” chaired by Trump, which will include former UK Prime Minister Tony Blair, will have “oversight and supervision” of the Palestinian committee. The plan says the Palestinian Authority will eventually take over Gaza once it has “completed its reform programme”.
Did anyone ask Palestinians if they accept?!
[…] shortly after the press conference, Reuters quoted a Hamas official as saying that the group had not received a “written Gaza peace plan” as yet.
Because Netanyahu’s never pretended to accept a deal before.
Hamas probably won’t go for this as it still requires them to demilitarize and they, along with a lot of Palestinians in gaza, view that as a path to slow ethnic cleansing like what’s happening in the west bank.
You’d think the “Hillary’s gonna take our guns” Republicans would understand not wanting to surrender your guns and security to a government in general, much less one that’s been trying to genocide you for decades.
I think there’s a reason they might actually go for it.
If you give Gaza to Trump, Trump may feel the need to “stick up for it”. I don’t know how likely that is, but clearly Palestine has exhausted all other options.
If you give Gaza to Trump, Trump may feel the need to "stick up for it
When has Trump ever done anything with what he owns except drain it of all value and discard it?
Given that Trump has publicly supported leveling Gaza and turning it into a luxury resort, I think it’s very questionable what he would be sticking up “for”
The war isn’t over and if anything this is just laying the groundwork to expand it
He is just explaining the thought process I think, not that it’s a good idea.
It won’t end. The stipulations mean it will go on forever. Point 1 talks about Israel eradicating all terror in the zone first.
Is IDF on suicide watch now?