• robot_dog_with_gun [they/them]@hexbear.net
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        4
        arrow-down
        1
        ·
        1 day ago

        sure, there’s the coup and some other things but my contention here is that without the nazis trying to start a civil war there wouldn’t be separatists or an escalation.

        • F_State@midwest.social
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          1
          arrow-down
          4
          ·
          1 day ago

          Russian escalation came because Putin was feeling the pressure from Navalny’s anti-corruption campaign and other domestic problems. His popularity was suffering and successful military operations had always improved his popularity in the past (as they do for most national leaders). Coupled that with his Imperialist ambitions and invading Ukraine seemed like a win/win to him. Domestic concerns influence Geopolitics more than geopolitical concerns do.

          • ☆ Yσɠƚԋσʂ ☆@lemmy.mlOP
            link
            fedilink
            arrow-up
            3
            arrow-down
            1
            ·
            16 hours ago

            It’s absolutely hilarious to me that people think that Navalny was ever some kind of a political force in Russia. The highest his party ever managed to reach was around 3% of the vote. He was a political nobody in Russia. Meanwhile, the fact that Ukrainian nationalists were committing atrocities against the people of Donbass actually did play a role in the decision of helping LPR and DPR liberate themselves. Funny how you trolls always screech about self determination, except when it goes against you narrative.

    • GiorgioPerlasca@lemmy.ml
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      8
      arrow-down
      1
      ·
      3 days ago

      Since 2014, it was not possible to control Azov and the far right in Ukraine. They could do what they wanted, they were above the law, and still are.