• muffedtrims@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    26
    ·
    2 days ago

    I would think that Kansas City would be a bigger hub since it already has a lot of rail through there and is more central in the country.

    • deceiver@infosec.pub
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      38
      ·
      2 days ago

      for freight, not passenger rail, which is what high-speed rail is primarily designed for

      • corsicanguppy@lemmy.ca
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        19
        arrow-down
        1
        ·
        2 days ago

        But dood. Put a USPS fishbowl-connected car on the end with a sorter working inside and prepping for each stop, and watch FedEx sweat.

        • entropicdrift@lemmy.sdf.org
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          6
          ·
          2 days ago

          Why sort in the train when you can sort ahead of time and maximize storage space? The ZIP code system allows for a national radix sort.

      • Cassanderer@thelemmy.club
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        8
        ·
        2 days ago

        Freight rail is a lot less than it should be as well.

        It is also owned by Private Industry without clear rules on what they can charge in that more than it should be.

        The rails were only made with eminent domain, Private Industry should not be able to screw people on it, or give preference to large companies over people and small ones.

    • atomicbocks@sh.itjust.works
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      9
      ·
      2 days ago

      As would I. There is an existing line from Kansas City to Tulsa to OKC that has been talked about being opened for passengers for a couple decades.