She made only one direct reference to Kirk, quoting his own words:

“Black women do not have the brain processing power to be taken seriously. You have to go steal a white person’s slot”. - Charlie Kirk

  • MagicShel@lemmy.zip
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    28
    arrow-down
    1
    ·
    12 hours ago

    I can’t know why you were downvoted. I generally don’t downvote and didn’t in this case. But were I to speculate…

    You pointed out a distinction without a difference. And the way you defended yourself preemptively makes you sound like you knew very well you were being pedantic and what the result would be. It doesn’t contribute anything of value to the conversation and leaves one with the impression you disagree it was outrageous to fire her — else why issue a meaningless “correction”?

    I don’t know why you did that, but I strongly suspect your downvotes are related to that thought-process.

    • atzanteol@sh.itjust.works
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      2
      arrow-down
      1
      ·
      8 hours ago

      And the way you defended yourself preemptively makes you sound like you knew very well you were being pedantic and what the result would be.

      Yeah - I’ve been around the internet before. You say “A” and you get 30 responses immediately for not saying “B”.

      You don’t think I would have been accused of defending Kirk? Have you just created an account on social media for the first time?

      • MagicShel@lemmy.zip
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        4
        ·
        7 hours ago

        Mate, I don’t really care. I responded with the idea that you were frustrated in good faith and just struggling with a bout of well-intentioned 'tism. I’ve been there before so I could relate.

        Also, welcome to the internet has been cringe for over twenty years, and I’ve been here since social media was alt.rec.your.mom.

        Of course you got accused for defending Kirk because there is no fathomable point to your post other than being disagreeable. The qualitative difference between what was said and your correction is nil. You knew what would happen, your preemptive protestations did nothing but make it clear you knew what you were doing and chose violence. But somehow “Lemmy” is the problem and not your comment.

        Well, have it your way. I’m moving on.

        • atzanteol@sh.itjust.works
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          1
          ·
          7 hours ago

          I mean - I’m not frustrated - more amused than anything else. My hypothesis is that nobody actually read the snopes link and just assumed it said something otherwise. 🤷

    • TrickDacy@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      1
      arrow-down
      4
      ·
      11 hours ago

      leaves one with the impression you disagree it was outrageous to fire her

      Definitely disagree here. They were clearly just trying to emphasize the importance of being correct, since being incorrect gives conservatives a way to argue against your point, even if it’s stupid and flimsy, it can be seized on.

      • MagicShel@lemmy.zip
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        8
        ·
        10 hours ago

        There is no actual difference between “Black women” and “You [black women]”. Anyone who feels it is arguable isn’t worth the effort to engage them because they aren’t coming at the conversation from a place of good faith anyway.

        • TrickDacy@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          1
          arrow-down
          3
          ·
          10 hours ago

          Tell that to the Republican who now can accurately claim a misquote happened. You don’t need to convince me.