If you look at history, there has never been a period of significant change without significant bloodshed.
The powers that be have been conditioning us for generations to believe that “violence isn’t the answer” so we can’t effectively challenge their power.
Nonviolence can change things. Take the civil rights movement or any union strike. Not to say there wasn’t bloodshed, but violence wasn’t the main driver for change.
If you look at history, there has never been a period of significant change without significant bloodshed.
The powers that be have been conditioning us for generations to believe that “violence isn’t the answer” so we can’t effectively challenge their power.
Nonviolence can change things. Take the civil rights movement or any union strike. Not to say there wasn’t bloodshed, but violence wasn’t the main driver for change.
Velvet Revolution
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Velvet_Revolution
I’m down for the violence. But not unhinged murder. The USA takes out important individuals in key positions. We just don’t make show of it.