• jordanlund@lemmy.worldM
    102·
    3 days ago

    You can manually add the image as the thumbnail when you edit the post to be the link so we don’t have to remove it.

      • jordanlund@lemmy.worldM
        32·
        3 days ago

        Intermittent reinforcement is the worst kind of reinforcement.

        “You didn’t remove their post, why did you remove miiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiinnnnneeeeeeee???”

        No, just… no.

    • Bonus@piefed.socialOPEnglish
      3·
      3 days ago

      Do you mean when I submit? Currently, I don’t see a way to remove the image. I submitted as an image via piefed. Might be a bit of difference between there and lemmy.world as far as that goes. Probably should just submit to lemmy.world from my account there in the future. The link is included but I didn’t notice your rule about single links till after I hit submit. Thanks.

      • jordanlund@lemmy.worldM
        11·
        3 days ago

        Yeah, when you submit, it SHOULD give you the option for URL and Thumbnail independent of each other.

        I use “Boost” as my app, but it should be the same elsewhere, not sure about Piefed:

        Additional notes, archive links, etc. can go in the body section.

    • Bonus@piefed.socialOPEnglish
      26·
      3 days ago

      Yep, one downside of having such an easily identifiable, strange and pointy idiosyncratic signature. Still waiting for a prison handwriting analyst to weigh in here.

      • floofloof@lemmy.ca
        361·
        3 days ago

        I’m a professional graphologist. The pointiness of his signature’s loops indicate that he’s a pedophile rapist. The height and aggressiveness of his vertical strokes indicate that he’s a pedophile rapist. The long tail at the end of the signature, and the use of a Sharpie, indicate that he’s a pedophile rapist. You’re welcome.

    • Bonus@piefed.socialOPEnglish
      122·
      3 days ago

      Is there anything he’s good at? A frustrated artist. Just like Hitler.*

      *except for the part where Hitler was actually a failed architectural illustrator who applied himself.

      The Architecture of Doom

      1989 documentary by Swedish director Peter Cohen and narrated by Rolf Arsenius. German- and English-language versions have also been released.

      The film explores the obsession Adolf Hitler had with his own particular vision of what was and was not aesthetically acceptable and how he applied these notions while running Nazi Germany. His obsession with art he considered pure, in opposition to the supposedly degenerate avant-garde works by Jewish and Soviet artists, reveals itself to be deeply connected to Hitler’s equally subjective and strict ideal of physical beauty and health. A series of so-called degenerate art exhibitions were sponsored in order to depict modernist painting and sculpture as expressions of mental illness and general depravity. Classical art that reinforced Hitler’s personal taste, from Roman statuary to Dutch oil paintings, was scavenged from across Nazi occupied Europe.

      Hitler is shown as an amateur architect, planning new building designs for Nazi Germany that express his vision of a Nordic empire to rival those of classical antiquity. He is said to be intimately familiar with the grand opera houses of Europe. He visits Paris with a group of architects and artists who will be tasked with rebuilding Berlin to suit the Nazi aesthetic. Designs for new structures include depictions of the ruins they will make for distant generations.

      The film posits that Hitler’s affinity for Greek and Roman antiquity is also expressed in his insistence of a totalizing strategy of war. In what Hitler imagined to be the style of Sparta and Rome, war was meant to annihilate the enemy, enslaving the population and erasing the history of the vanquished.

      https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=WPZIfW9TNRg

  • omgboom@lemmy.dbzer0.comEnglish
    271·
    3 days ago

    Was this leaked or something previously? I swear to God I’ve read these cringey words on this card before but I’m too tired to remember where.

    • Bonus@piefed.socialOPEnglish
      46·
      3 days ago

      This has been quoted extensively in recent stories but the actual physical illustration has not been released previously. Donold denied its existence, of course.

    • hector@lemmy.today
      1·
      3 days ago

      Yeah months ago The Wall Street Journal described it having been shown it I believe but did not have the actual letter to show, which they now do I suppose

  • KaChilde@sh.itjust.works
    19·
    3 days ago

    This is somehow worse than I imagined. This looks like the sort of coded calling card a serial killer who dismembers women would leave at the scene of his crimes.

  • BussyGyatt@feddit.orgEnglish
    2·
    3 days ago

    you’re all missing the most important part, in my opinion. yes, you’ve seen the indication of breast buds, but has anyone noticed the not-even-implied dismemberment? the arms aren’t cut off by the page. they’re depicted as amputated. the torso is depicted as headless and legless. instead, a bare cunt with donald’s name on it where legs should be.

    and no face.

    a headless, limbless, torso. donald’s name on the cunt and both their names all over the body. two men who have certain things in common. a secret that never ages.

    You know what would be more to life if you had everything already? Being able to get rid of the evidence of anything.

  • hector@lemmy.today
    1·
    3 days ago

    How the journal got their hands on this is another wonderful secret. They are such an enigma, a collector of people, or some shit