• mercano@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    46
    ·
    1 day ago

    Yanking someone’s security detail because they ran against you is petty. Yanking it with, what is it, five days notice, that’s just being a dick.

    • JollyBrancher@sh.itjust.works
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      8
      ·
      1 day ago

      Not to mention it can set a wild precedent. When the “outcry” occurs when (*if based on the current spinelessness) it happens to the people who currently support it? Eat a festering pustule. Forget going high; punch them in the face. Metaphorically.

    • betterdeadthanreddit@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      6
      arrow-down
      1
      ·
      1 day ago

      I’ll disagree to agree more: yanking the security because someone ran against you with 5 days notice is being a petty dick.

  • tal@lemmy.today
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    22
    ·
    edit-2
    1 day ago

    Unlike the Secret Service, CHP only has law enforcement power in California. I guess technically CHP could have armed people out-of-state, but it’d be like any other armed civilian bodyguard then. So this is really only a comparable solution as long as Harris doesn’t leave California.

    Frankly, it does occur to me that this is probably a good idea in general. Like, states should not have to cover this, but Trump pulling protection is not a good precedent, and mitigating that might be a good idea. It looks like John Bolton lives in Maryland — Trump just had the FBI raid his house, so he was in the news — and it might be a good idea for Maryland to provide a state police protection detail. At least as things stand, the number of people getting Secret Service protection pulled is not too large, so it’s probably realistically doable to handle it at a state level.

  • originalucifer@moist.catsweat.com
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    60
    ·
    2 days ago

    i grew up with california kind of being the butt of all jokes… but here it is more of a democracy in the service of the people than the country to which it supposedly belongs.