☆ Yσɠƚԋσʂ ☆@lemmy.mlM to United States | News & Politics@lemmy.mlEnglish · 1 month agoVote harderlemmy.mlimagemessage-square31fedilinkarrow-up1174arrow-down12
arrow-up1172arrow-down1imageVote harderlemmy.ml☆ Yσɠƚԋσʂ ☆@lemmy.mlM to United States | News & Politics@lemmy.mlEnglish · 1 month agomessage-square31fedilink
minus-squareSatansMaggotyCumFart@piefed.worldlinkfedilinkEnglisharrow-up2arrow-down2·1 month agoIn this case the court agreed with the DNC that they didn’t cheat so who are you quoting?
minus-squarepiefood@feddit.onlinelinkfedilinkEnglisharrow-up4arrow-down1·1 month agoNo, the court agreed that they are allowed to cheat.
minus-squareSatansMaggotyCumFart@piefed.worldlinkfedilinkEnglisharrow-up2arrow-down3·1 month agoCheating is when you don’t play by the rules not when you disagree with what the rules should be. That’s why the DNC won this case.
minus-squarepiefood@feddit.onlinelinkfedilinkEnglisharrow-up5arrow-down1·1 month agoYou can keep dancing around the fact that they cheated all you want. I find it very telling that you can’t even keep your original argument straight.
minus-squareSatansMaggotyCumFart@piefed.worldlinkfedilinkEnglisharrow-up2arrow-down3·1 month agoThat Clinton got more votes then Bernie?
minus-squareGrapho@lemmy.mllinkfedilinkarrow-up3arrow-down1·1 month agoDear God, are you an eight year old or just acting like one? “How was Jon Jones cheating? He literally won”, how the fuck is that a rebuttal of the original statement?
In this case the court agreed with the DNC that they didn’t cheat so who are you quoting?
No, the court agreed that they are allowed to cheat.
Cheating is when you don’t play by the rules not when you disagree with what the rules should be.
That’s why the DNC won this case.
You can keep dancing around the fact that they cheated all you want. I find it very telling that you can’t even keep your original argument straight.
That Clinton got more votes then Bernie?
Dear God, are you an eight year old or just acting like one?
“How was Jon Jones cheating? He literally won”, how the fuck is that a rebuttal of the original statement?