I imagine its mainly a matter of 1) expertise, and 2) priorities.
The detectives who are actually good at solving crimes get burdened with hundreds of cases, then suffer from burnout and retire early like a lot of professions nowadays. Then the people who come to replace them have no experience, have to learn from scratch, and the cycle repeats.
Solving murders (especially when it involves poor people getting murdered) isn’t profitable, and isn’t prioritized as much as revenue-generating activities like drug busts, traffic ticketing, and getting poor and homeless people into the court and prison system. Like its probably <1% of cops of any given larger city that work on and know how to solve crimes like murder or theft. Cops are the hired goons of your city’s capitalists, protecting their property is what they’re paid to do.
My car got broken into when I was in highschool, and I learned the lesson that US cops aren’t going to help you, and probably don’t know how to solve even simple crimes like petty theft. It gains them nothing to help you, and that’s not what they’re being paid to do.
cops aren’t going to help you, and probably don’t know how to solve even simple crimes like petty theft. It gains them nothing to help you, and that’s not what they’re being paid to do.
Even with an exceptionally well trained team of detectives, getting a 90%+ clearance rate seems very suspicious. It is more likely that rather than having better detectives then than we have now, it’s that the police now have to go up against better science and technology that can help keep innocent people from being convicted. Bank teen the police just needed to take a few pieces of evidence and create a believable story from it, but now they need that story to match DNA, surveillance, and the right size glove.
Cops in the past were still cops. They didn’t care about accurately solving a murder of a poor person, they just wanted to be able to find someone they could punish for it so they could move on to the next thing.
I imagine its mainly a matter of 1) expertise, and 2) priorities.
My car got broken into when I was in highschool, and I learned the lesson that US cops aren’t going to help you, and probably don’t know how to solve even simple crimes like petty theft. It gains them nothing to help you, and that’s not what they’re being paid to do.
Even with an exceptionally well trained team of detectives, getting a 90%+ clearance rate seems very suspicious. It is more likely that rather than having better detectives then than we have now, it’s that the police now have to go up against better science and technology that can help keep innocent people from being convicted. Bank teen the police just needed to take a few pieces of evidence and create a believable story from it, but now they need that story to match DNA, surveillance, and the right size glove.
Cops in the past were still cops. They didn’t care about accurately solving a murder of a poor person, they just wanted to be able to find someone they could punish for it so they could move on to the next thing.