• scytale@lemmy.zip
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    39
    arrow-down
    2
    ·
    10 days ago

    Yeah I didn’t really enjoy prim and proper corporate Colbert. His show was pretty mediocre. I believe it was also his decision to step away from his original persona and move on to a standard talk show host, so he actually wanted that change. Ferguson is still the GOAT for me.

    • boydster@sh.itjust.works
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      9
      arrow-down
      1
      ·
      10 days ago

      I thought it was because Comedy Central had a claimed trademark or something regarding the character he played, but it’s been a while so I might be misremembering

        • boydster@sh.itjust.works
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          5
          ·
          edit-2
          10 days ago

          Irrelevant and refuted by Colbert’s own words, but ok. Viacom quite literally wouldn’t allow it.

          https://www.hollywoodreporter.com/news/general-news/stephen-colbert-colbert-report-character-915236/

          But on Wednesday night’s Late Show, the real Stephen Colbert indicated that Comedy Central’s legal team is barring his old character from appearing on CBS.

          “This is true, immediately after that show, CBS’ top lawyer was contacted by the top lawyer for another company to say that the character Stephen Colbert is their intellectual property,” the real Stephen Colbert said on Wednesday.

          He continued, “So it is with a heavy heart that I announce that thanks to corporate lawyers, the character Stephen Colbert, host of The Colbert Report, will never be seen again.”

          The audience began to boo but the Late Show host insisted there was nothing he could do.

          “I feel the same way, but what can I do? The lawyers have spoken. I cannot reasonably argue I own my face or name,” he said. “And as much as I’d like to have that guy on again, I can’t.”

          • ohulancutash@feddit.uk
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            1
            arrow-down
            1
            ·
            10 days ago

            That refers to a bit he did with the Colbert character over a year into the run of the show. He has said in various interviews that he chose not to do the Late Show in any character because he felt he’d done that and it would be disrespectful to the franchise.

      • prole@lemmy.blahaj.zone
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        3
        arrow-down
        1
        ·
        10 days ago

        No way CBS would have allowed him to do the show in that character… Maybe a segment every now and then, but not entire episodes. Not on CBS.

        • boydster@sh.itjust.works
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          2
          ·
          10 days ago

          He quite literally was legally disallowed by Viacom (Comedy Central’ owners). Not CBS, where he told the audience he would love to bring the character back but was not legally allowed to do.