• finitebanjo@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    4
    arrow-down
    1
    ·
    1 day ago

    Oooohhh Grooosssssss! It’s gonna fucking overtake the real content so fast, now. jfc, how do we even sort them out if the “creators” don’t follow the disclosure rules?

    • ijedi1234@sh.itjust.works
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      4
      arrow-down
      1
      ·
      20 hours ago

      You need to train your ability to spot AI.

      AI art has a very distinctive style. Weird shadows, impossible architecture, and having a blatantly incorrect number of fingers are dead giveaways.

      AI text tends to talk at you rather than with you. It has difficulty remembering context, so it tends to forget what you said 10 lines ago.

      • finitebanjo@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        4
        ·
        19 hours ago

        How about we figure out a better way to detect and sort it so I don’t have to waste time making judgements?

        • ijedi1234@sh.itjust.works
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          2
          arrow-down
          1
          ·
          19 hours ago

          You’re assuming that the detector can be trusted. The detector could be someone who is being paid to mislead you on purpose.

          If AI presence really matters to you, you need to trust your own two eyes for this sort of thing. Offloading that work to someone else is a considerable risk.

          And to be honest, detecting AI is pretty fast once you’re able to spot it. I can spot the typical variants of AI art in just a few seconds.

            • ijedi1234@sh.itjust.works
              link
              fedilink
              English
              arrow-up
              1
              arrow-down
              1
              ·
              18 hours ago

              The halting problem makes that somewhat impossible to make. Detectors have a notable weakness with detecting themselves.

          • finitebanjo@lemmy.world
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            1
            ·
            21 hours ago

            A lot of great games get middling reviews, but I’m expected to parse whether or not something contains slop by a glance?

            • Echo Dot@feddit.uk
              link
              fedilink
              English
              arrow-up
              2
              arrow-down
              1
              ·
              20 hours ago

              I mean that’s exactly how it’s always worked. What’s the difference just because the AI exists

              • finitebanjo@lemmy.world
                link
                fedilink
                English
                arrow-up
                2
                arrow-down
                1
                ·
                20 hours ago

                No, theres a fucking difference, mate. AI has empowered the worst people to make shit they otherwise couldn’t have, and it has degraded the works of anyone with some level of skill.

                • Echo Dot@feddit.uk
                  link
                  fedilink
                  English
                  arrow-up
                  2
                  arrow-down
                  1
                  ·
                  10 hours ago

                  Yeah because there hasn’t been a bunch of asset flip slop before. All it’s changed is that they have new tools to make it but there was always crappy stuff on Steam