His win is a direct result of the Supreme Court’s decision in a pivotal LGBTQ+ rights case.

  • El Barto@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    39
    arrow-down
    8
    ·
    edit-2
    1 year ago

    You’re also equating the cause of the feeling of repulsion.

    You’re repulsed by Nazis because Nazis are evil.

    Why are you repulsed by gay people? Hate. Yes, even if disguised behind “religious reasons.”

    Regardless, I’m not saying that we must force the photographer to “work while being repulsed” (and I wouldn’t want anyone on my wedding day that I know is repulsed by it anyway, but I digress.) I’m saying that we must continue peeling off that core of a hateful onion that is religion and bigotry until nothing is left.

    And having said that: don’t want to deal with “the gays”? Don’t start a business in a place where gay people are protected. I’d say this ruling is in the wrong.

    Also, I believe the photographer should be able to reject a job due to its type of content. Hear me out. Gay wedding? Yes. Gay wedding with a dildo theme? Nah. Straight wedding? Yes. Straight wedding with a cat killing theme? Nah.

    • Okokimup@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      2
      arrow-down
      1
      ·
      1 year ago

      I’m not sure if you’re using the general “you” or the specific “you” so I just want to clarify that I am bisexual and not at all repulsed by LGBT people.

      You make a good argument in your last paragraph. Photography is a more difficult situation to judge than the cake thing, but I feel like the photographer is often such an integral part of the wedding, that it’s more of a participatory service, and my argument is about not making people participate in something they find unsavory.

    • Woht24@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      11
      arrow-down
      24
      ·
      1 year ago

      The ruling is absolutely not wrong.

      You can’t force someone to do something they don’t want to do. Full stop. Whether they don’t want to do it for good, bad, racist, homophobic etc reasons, is irrelevant.

      No matter how much you support peace, love and happiness, you can’t start telling others what they can and can’t do. You have the right to refuse service for whatever reason.

      • Fedizen@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        27
        arrow-down
        3
        ·
        1 year ago

        how many years ago did people make this argument to refuse to serve black people?

        Genetics are understood to account up to 40% of gay men’s sexual identities. Why should we allow businesses to make exceptions on a potentially genetic basis?

      • Jerkface@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        22
        arrow-down
        7
        ·
        1 year ago

        You can’t force someone to do something they don’t want to do. Full stop.

        If you are a business serving the public, yes you the fuck can.

        Whether they don’t want to do it for good, bad, racist, homophobic etc reasons, is irrelevant.

        We had an entire Civil Rights Act about it. It prohibits discrimination on the basis of race, color, religion, sex or national origin.

        Read a fucking book.