A homeowner in Goodyear, Arizona is locked in a dispute with his homeowner’s association over his practice of distributing free cold water from his driveway.

  • JoshuaFalken@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    84
    ·
    10 hours ago

    I found an update about the vote to remove the three board members.

    Homeowners voted 190 to 20 in favour of removal, however the board cancelled the vote claiming there wasn’t a 24 hour notice given to the community and subsequently that 210 votes might not qualify a quorum of more than a thousand homes.

    • ramble81@lemmy.zip
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      3
      ·
      2 hours ago

      Luckily both of those are easy to remediate. The bylaws state what is a quorum and you can give more notice. This won’t stop things.

    • MNByChoice@midwest.social
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      47
      ·
      10 hours ago

      Oh, that will go well. Piss off people and make their vote not count. The people that know where you live and can see your front door…

      • JoshuaFalken@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        10
        arrow-down
        1
        ·
        7 hours ago

        To play devil’s advocate for a moment, having a sufficient vote notification period is important.

        Though if that were the board’s true concern, they surely would have announced intention to notify the community alongside their statement cancelling the vote for this reason, which hasn’t happened insofar as I can tell.

        Voting details:

        According to recent census data, Goodyear has 2.7 people per household. It doesn’t say for the city specifically, but Arizona appears to have a minor population of 21%. I saw in the statement this association represents “over 1,000” households. In my experience, that could mean anywhere from 1,001 - 1,099 homes. The city of Goodyear held a vote earlier this year to approve a water utility contract, which lists an expected voter turnout of 17%.

        By this, I’m guessing less than 3,000 people live in this community, with about 2,400 eligible to vote on an association proposal, but likely around 400 people that would go to the effort of voting on such a tedious issue.

        I think that if half of the community shows up with less than a day’s notice to make themselves heard, that’s probably representative enough for how the community feels about these board members.

    • j0ester@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      19
      ·
      9 hours ago

      Donald stated you’ll never have to vote again… retards cheered. This is how it will start.

    • nthavoc@lemmy.today
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      8
      ·
      9 hours ago

      Well that sucks. I don’t know what their rules are, but having dealt with shitty HOA’s, if all the rules of the agreement were followed and you get their attorneys involved, their attorneys in most cases will tell those dickheads knock it off if the agreement was followed. This sounds like a violation on the HOA’s part of the agreement but again, I don’t know how it’s written. I do know if an update was pushed every single resident shall have received the update for it be valid and they shall have a copy of the agreement ready upon request. I hate shitty HOA’s. Good luck to them.