Zackey Rahimi, the Texas criminal defendant challenging a federal gun law before the Supreme Court on Tuesday, said this summer that he no longer wanted to own firearms and expressed remorse for his actions that got him in trouble with the law.

“I will make sure for sure this time that when I finish my time being incarcerated to stay the faithful, righteous person I am this day, to stay away from all drugs at all times, do probation & parole rightfully, to go to school & have a great career, have a great manufacturing engineering job, to never break any law again, to stay away from the wrong circle, to stay away from all firearms & weapons, & to never be away from my family again,” Rahimi, who is being held at a Fort Worth jail, said in a handwritten letter dated July 25.

He continued: “I had firearms for the right reason in our place to be able to protect my family at all times especially for what we’ve went through in the past but I’ll make sure to do whatever it takes to be able to do everything the right pathway & to be able to come home fast as I can to take care of my family at all times.”

  • quindraco@lemm.ee
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    11
    arrow-down
    31
    ·
    1 year ago

    I mean, this particular gun law violates the 14A, so it’s good for all of us if 2A supporters go after it.

    • stolid_agnostic@lemmy.ml
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      12
      arrow-down
      4
      ·
      1 year ago

      How is putting guns in the hands of known abusers a good thing to do? Why is that person’s right to a gun more important to the lives of those around him?

      • quindraco@lemm.ee
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        6
        arrow-down
        9
        ·
        1 year ago

        known abusers

        Incorrect. For that to be correct, there would have to be a standard of proof. The correct term here is accused abusers.

        • PoliticalAgitator@lemm.ee
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          11
          arrow-down
          7
          ·
          1 year ago

          Semantics are easy when you’re sacrificing other people’s lives.

          It’s bizarre you think yourself a hero as you openly advocate putting the property of abusers over the safety of those they abuse, like temporarily losing access to firearms is a bigger tragedy than being executed by a former partner.

          Are we supposed to politely ignore how that makes you look? People who hit their wives also post on social media and it shouldn’t come as a shock to people that they also tend see themselves the victim and right about everything.

          You’re a big brave boy, you can handle a few months away from your beloved guns.

        • stolid_agnostic@lemmy.ml
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          2
          arrow-down
          2
          ·
          1 year ago

          So you engage in sophistry to avoid an actual argument. That didn’t fly in Ancient Greece and won’t fly here.