• Kairos@lemmy.today
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    4
    ·
    edit-2
    2 days ago

    Instead, “imaginary time” is defined as a length of time that can be multiplied by the square root of -1,

    Is this actually the definition? This is just “which numbers are divisible by 4” “all of them, you jut might get ¼, ½, or ¾.” but in reverse, no?

    • knightly the Sneptaur@pawb.social
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      4
      ·
      2 days ago

      Imaginary numbers are defined as the square roots of negative numbers, or as multiples of i, so yes that definition of imaginary time is accurate.

      The square roots of negative numbers are different because they are neither rational nor irrational numbers, so they can be combined with real numbers to form complex numbers. Complex numbers are vital to mathematics because they allow you to solve polynominal equations that can’t be solved with real numbers alone, like (x+1)^2 =-9 where x = -1±3i

        • knightly the Sneptaur@pawb.social
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          4
          ·
          edit-2
          21 hours ago

          It’s only relevant at quantum scales, so it’s not something we can experience directly. The super oversimplified version is that imaginary time is what light is doing while it moves through a medium where it can’t travel at light speed. Light always travels at light speed, but it can pass through infinitessimally small closed loops of time where the light isn’t interacting with anything but is nevertheless delayed by things it might have interacted with.

        • Hanrahan@slrpnk.net
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          2
          ·
          1 day ago

          That Truro was elected a second time was beyond my imagination, we are living in imaginery time /s