(Text below written by @[email protected]. Hope you don’t mind me yoinking it for here!)

The European Citizens’ Initiative ‘Stop Destroying Videogames’ is nearing its deadline on July 31st and is still missing quite a lot of signatures. To be precise, at the time of writing this post, only 560.000 of the required 1.000.000 signatures have been reached.

Another requirement has already been fulfilled: The minimum signature threshold has been reached in 10 countries, 7 were required.

If this is the first time of you hearing about this initiative, here’s a short TL;DR for you (more detailed information can be found here):

  • Publishers that sell or license videogames should have to leave their videogames in a functional (playable) state.
  • This means: Remote disabling of video games (such as live service titles) without providing means of keeping the game functional without the involvement of the publisher should be illegal.
  • This does NOT mean that publishers should support their games forever, but rather that they provide tools (such as server binaries) to enable others to keep the game playable.

The initiative is slowly picking up speed again recently after its creator published a video explaining some of the background and why he doesn’t want to continue after the initiative is over. The video has been well-received by the community and some big influencers have reported on the topic.

If you are an EU citizen and have not signed yet, THIS IS THE TIME! The month until the deadline is met will pass quickly. Use two minutes of your time to influence something that may improve your life forever!

CLICK HERE TO SIGN. (or click here for a guide on how to sign in your language)

Also, if you are a UK citizen, you can sign a different legal petition here, which also helps tremendously:

https://www.stopkillinggames.com/countries/united_kingdom

  • Magnus@lemmy.dbzer0.com
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    2
    ·
    17 minutes ago

    Signed the UK parliament one, sadly drowning in those Brexit benefits when it comes to the other.

  • kazerniel@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    1
    ·
    4 minutes ago

    I’m an EU citizen living in the UK, but only signed the UK one because I’m not putting my passport ID into petitions O.o

  • SabinStargem@lemmy.today
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    2
    ·
    1 hour ago

    I hope this petition succeeds. There are games and other digital media I want to experience, but corporations are dead set on just trotting out new things on their terms.

  • brsrklf@jlai.lu
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    9
    ·
    2 hours ago

    I’ve been hearing about this for so long I honestly can’t remember whether I’ve already signed it.

    • Gonzako@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      7
      ·
      1 hour ago

      Not an issue! Just try signing in again and it won’t add it if you already signed

    • drspawndisaster@sh.itjust.works
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      4
      arrow-down
      1
      ·
      1 hour ago

      As an American who can’t bear to play most online games because they might go down or disallow Linux users, please please please please check. EU laws are our only hope of having usable fucking technology.

      The thought of being able to mod and host my own GTA 5 online server when it goes down, without some weird custom server mod that also uses Windows-exclusive anti-cheat on most servers, sounds like a damn dream. I miss that game… but fuck Windows, nothing is worth installing Windows. I just realized I’ve been ranting about the lack of Linux compatibility of GTA 5 Online in reply to someone’s comment about how this petition has gone on for a while. I swear I wasn’t hijacking your comment, I just have strong feelings about Linux gaming and got carried away.

  • Echo Dot@feddit.uk
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    22
    ·
    3 hours ago

    I hope the wording of the petition is very clear. The last time this was brought up in the UK the government of the time basically just brushed it off by intentionally misunderstanding the petition. You can’t give them any leeway to do that this time.

    • ProdigalFrog@slrpnk.netOP
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      10
      ·
      2 hours ago

      I suspect they would’ve brushed it off regardless, they didn’t want to deal with it. There’s another 100k UK petition that would force them to re-look at it with more depth which is also ending quite soon.

  • PieMePlenty@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    21
    ·
    4 hours ago

    Drama drives these things. I totally understand Ross not wanting to engage in it 10 months ago but look at what it can do.

  • Treasure@feddit.org
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    14
    ·
    4 hours ago

    Not only do I not mind you yoinking the text, I want to thank you for your contribution to the cause. If everyone who has signed could get one more person to sign, the initiative would succeed!

  • cecilkorik@piefed.ca
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    59
    ·
    9 hours ago

    This also has big implications for consumer rights and society as a whole in other areas of digital technology and right to repair, it is a foot in the door to start actually holding manufacturers responsible for the full lifecycle of their products (digital and real) that requires them to actually relinquish their control when their product reaches end-of-commercial-life, instead of turning everything into digital garbage out of what basically amounts to apathy and compulsive rights hoarding.

  • paraphrand@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    11
    arrow-down
    5
    ·
    8 hours ago

    Well, that pirate guy didn’t do anything. (Unless he actually caused this, then… messy causality…)

    • Essence_of_Meh@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      60
      arrow-down
      1
      ·
      7 hours ago

      He actively misrepresented the campaign and spread misinformation about its goals. I don’t know if he genuinely didn’t understand or if he was too embarrassed to admit to a mistake but he did a lot of damage to the momentum and perception of the whole thing.

      It sucks these big creators only now pick up the mantle but it’s better than nothing. There’s still some time left.

      • MolochAlter@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        12
        ·
        3 hours ago

        I don’t know if he genuinely didn’t understand or if he was too embarrassed to admit to a mistake

        Worse, he actively lied. In his edited video about the petition he actively misrepresents the initiative, then goes on to edit out the the part of Ross’ video that would have contradicted his misrepresentation.

        This is not an innocent or negligent mistake on Thor’s part, it’s an active attempt at burial.

        • derpgon@programming.dev
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          4
          ·
          2 hours ago

          Even worse, he is a narcissistic lying piece of shit with high ego. He would never admit a slight mistake, and thinks of himself as all-knowing. Think ChatGPT - confidently lying all the time, but always doubling down.

      • SCmSTR@lemmy.blahaj.zone
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        1
        ·
        3 hours ago

        I haven’t really been following it or him (I don’t really even know much, other than the gist of not wanting games to disappear when devs decide it’s too expensive to keep the servers). What did he do? Because normally he gives pretty good takes.

        • paris@lemmy.blahaj.zone
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          7
          ·
          edit-2
          2 hours ago

          He wildly misunderstood/misrepresented the initiative two videos in a row (and continues to ten months later), and he continually discredits the entire initiative because of contrived edge cases.

          I think this paragraph from this twitter reply really sums it up:

          My dislike of the initiative stems entirely from the wording to keep all games in a “Functional Playable State” after sunsetting which is not possible for all games and could limit what kinds of games people make in the future.

          The idea that creativity would be hampered because games would have to remain playable when the company shuts down servers one day is ridiculous. Can you imagine if we talked like this about anything else? “We can’t force every phone to use the same USB-C charging port because it would be too technically infeasible to do so and hamper creativity.” “We can’t outlaw CFCs because they’re useful chemicals and it would be technically infeasible for some products to be made without chlorofluorocarbons (the things that fucked up the ozone layer).” “My dislike of the initiative stems entirely from the wording to ‘make cars limit their emissions’ which is not possible for all cars and could limit what kinds of cars companies make in the future.” Ridiculous.

          It’s absurd that I’m not exaggerating when I say his opposition to Stop Killing Games entirely boils down to “I think companies should be allowed to take games away because it would be really hard for them to leave some games playable when they’re done supporting them 🥺”

          I used to passively like Thor, but when I watched those two videos he made last year about SKG I lost all of my respect for him.