• Saleh@feddit.org
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    6
    arrow-down
    1
    ·
    8 hours ago

    In other words:

    Upholding a rules based international order is actually beneficial, also to the West. By undermining the ICC to parade around the genocidal scumbag Netanyahu, countries like the US, Hungary and Germany are hurting themselves as it grants people like Putin more movement and recognition in the world.

    Meanwhile “the global south” has a vested interest in strengthening the ICC and ICJ as these institutions can help bring some balance against the imperial actors who have been suppressing them far too long.

    If someone brings up Mongolia because of Putin having visited there, Mongolia is a landlocked country with 3.5 million people, sandwiched between Russia and China. They have very little diplomatic maneuverability.

    • Green_Mouse@piefed.social
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      8
      arrow-down
      1
      ·
      17 hours ago

      Well, it’s not news, Russia and many Russians like to act badass, while they are quite the opposite of being badass and brave.

          • 9point6@lemmy.world
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            8
            arrow-down
            1
            ·
            17 hours ago

            That wasn’t the question I was answering, but I’m sure very few if any

            • UnderpantsWeevil@lemmy.world
              link
              fedilink
              English
              arrow-up
              1
              arrow-down
              7
              ·
              17 hours ago

              It might be worth asking why a national leader simply handing oneself over to a militant opposition isn’t something that happens more frequently. Is there no such thing as a valiant national leader? Or would martyring yourself for the sake of a foreign coalition’s legal code be kinda pointless and dumb?

              • 9point6@lemmy.world
                link
                fedilink
                English
                arrow-up
                8
                arrow-down
                1
                ·
                edit-2
                17 hours ago

                Sure, but it’s the valiant choice.

                A truly valiant leader probably wouldn’t find themselves in the situation where it was necessary to do that

                • UnderpantsWeevil@lemmy.world
                  link
                  fedilink
                  English
                  arrow-up
                  2
                  arrow-down
                  8
                  ·
                  edit-2
                  16 hours ago

                  it’s the valiant choice.

                  In the same way that shoving your dick into a wood chipper is, sure.

                  Was Alexi Navalny valiant? Was Prigovian? Was Milosivec? Was Saddam Hussein?

                  A truly valiant leader probably wouldn’t find themselves in the situation where it was necessary to do that

                  “No truly valiant person has ever had a warrant out for their arrest” is…

                  Come on dude.